Re: [6tisch] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-6tisch-architecture-24: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Fri, 09 August 2019 17:58 UTC
Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E760120041; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 10:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, GB_SUMOF=5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ySukEQmQaB3X; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 10:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE910120019; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 10:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id x79HvuK0029319 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 9 Aug 2019 13:57:59 -0400
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 12:57:56 -0500
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, shwetha.bhandari@gmail.com, 6tisch@ietf.org, 6tisch-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6tisch-architecture@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20190809175755.GR59807@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <156523675061.8257.3166819796531461415.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <23884.39664.259560.559115@fireball.acr.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <23884.39664.259560.559115@fireball.acr.fi>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/l1ce1NI_991wCvmMkH1fxLyu3Wo>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-6tisch-architecture-24: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 17:58:05 -0000
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 12:58:08AM +0300, Tero Kivinen wrote: > Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker writes: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > DISCUSS: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Section 4.3.4 asserts: > > > > [...] We'll note that the Join > > Priority is now specified between 0 and 0x3F leaving 2 bits in the > > octet unused in the IEEE Std. 802.15.4e specification. After > > consultation with IEEE authors, it was asserted that 6TiSCH can make > > a full use of the octet to carry an integer value up to 0xFF. > > > > I'm extremely reluctant to publish this text in the IETF stream without > > a citation. > > IEEE Std 802.15.4-2015 says: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > 7.4.4.2 TSCH Synchronization IE > > The TSCH Synchronization IE Content field shall be formatted as > illustrated in Figure 7-50. > > +-------------+---------------+ > | Octets: 5 | 1 | > +-------------+---------------+ > | ASN | Join Metric | > +-------------+---------------+ > > Figure 7-50 -- TSCH Synchronization IE Content field format > > The ASN field contains the ASN corresponding to the timeslot in which > the enhanced beacon is sent. The ASN is used as the Frame Counter for > security operations if enabled. > > The Join Metric field is an unsigned integer and shall be set to > macJoinMetric. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > And > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Section 8.4.2.2 TSCH-specific MAC PIB attributes > > ... > > Table 8-83 -- TSCH-specific MAC PIB attributes > > Attribute Type Range Description Default > ... > macJoinMetric Integer 0x00–0xff The sum of one and the 1 > value of the Join Metric > field from the TSCH > Synchronization IE, 7.4.4.2, > received in the Enhanced Beacon > frame used by the device > joining the network. If the > device is the an endpoint, the > value shall be set to zero. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > So it is very clear that Join Metric can be any number between > 0x00-0xff. Great news; I see that Pascal will update the text/reference. > > scheduled cell: A cell which is assigned a neighbor MAC address > > (broadcast address is also possible), and one or more of > > the following flags: TX, RX, shared, timeskeeping. A > > > > "timeskeeping" does not seem to be defined anywhere. > > Timekeeping comes from the IEEE Std 802.15.4-2015 Section 7.4.4.3 TSCH > Slotframe and Link IE: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > The Timekeeping field shall be set to one if the link is to be used > for clock synchronization and shall be set to zero otherwise. RX > links shall have the Timekeeping field set to one. Ah, so it's just a typo and not a term of art. Thanks! -Ben
- [6tisch] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-6… Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
- [6tisch] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-6… Tero Kivinen
- Re: [6tisch] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ie… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ie… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [6tisch] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ie… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ie… Benjamin Kaduk