IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6tisch] Tagging join traffic

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 11 December 2017 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFAFE12422F for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 05:11:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cxw4z-g89p_H for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 05:11:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBDAD1242F5 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 05:11:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F3820090; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 08:14:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AD2814AD; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 08:11:25 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: =?utf-8?B?TWFsacWhYSBWdcSNaW5pxIc=?= <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr>
cc: 6tisch <6tisch@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <7FA36E3F-D1CA-4175-AB0B-9312DF90B7FA@inria.fr>
References: <07BA1D2B-2546-4E7B-B722-0CCE1E395BEE@inria.fr> <5691.1509986797@dooku.sandelman.ca> <7888.1511918950@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <D28EDD34-A92B-4853-8245-65DEA62697D3@cisco.com> <6445.1511969810@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <15719.1511979590@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <5105CA98-4A75-497C-B398-A371E131E164@inria.fr> <27122.1512151669@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <17797E86-6532-472B-B192-B6C2E2903C31@inria.fr> <21601.1512435917@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <7FA36E3F-D1CA-4175-AB0B-9312DF90B7FA@inria.fr>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7-RC3; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 08:11:25 -0500
Message-ID: <24654.1512997885@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/tmfA2Q5p6vp1Hz71_rIooITjiUc>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] Tagging join traffic
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 13:11:29 -0000

Mališa Vučinić <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr> wrote:
    > So should we stick to AF4x or switch to a lower value?

I think that it's arbitrary.

    > On 5 Dec 2017, at 02:05, Michael Richardson
    > <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:



    > - Any particular reason why you chose class 100 i.e. (AF43 and
    > AF42)
    > and not any other class from RFC2597?


    > I believed at the time that AF1x would have priority over AF2x,
    > etc.
    > but that's not the correct.



--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email