[6tisch] nbr cache recommendation
Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 13 November 2017 09:46 UTC
Return-Path: <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E54128B38 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 01:46:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id axJt-tS2HGhU for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 01:46:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA54812762F for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 01:46:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id y80so13381072wmd.0 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 01:46:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=lQu761LSxLnMmEGdUalq/ZJfC2wjK05zsKzKWPKY+nk=; b=btO2Stuw3yP7diLY7A/n7B6zdY2CGMrAFjA5g6/E57b9+XJs1wYV/UH/bJqS/1QQQ/ 5OkEKzfEjTKSmlwTNXjZ4HMNMffh0H+MVUHZC2u0xN2PR0BDfIJ0466Qdxs1AxFVxWgC pA8MUjbyvm7C8AZWGECXERwCRej3Wo966DZBTim0eYPrUmVbCP5ZHKFMWOJCPX6gP8qo 6yE24/zlHHHMOiysrHROETgXFMXI7zTj7VKmSRtZZZ2JjEggY8n5cVUthMu7GE/u1yj+ lL+iodgLGT7F+95v/U8GC6XACwYeSPtv4TfY+SOriZyQ3YvY/8HFbeXgZPtH+2lPRq1Q hhBA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=lQu761LSxLnMmEGdUalq/ZJfC2wjK05zsKzKWPKY+nk=; b=NUqscx7YZPDE5j8DKyHS56RoyNQYs/25bmFoPA29cJHLH5u2zdoY/VvBgT/v6SOcnP zHQ2y6KmHQVc6X2NF4N2ZdUau3a3jnYnnzGG/HkiiAm2MD9Z5/pX8bE9wYGIRs2kEWIC S3G3ZaXoccdK81VBtiG1Ykk7RmIeh7PdA2umm9qAAAHbMHzQxOL74oNQwMtC3aW/s4SA YZQrnYYqYdXWxN1G8y/HRDUzGiXHSXawSVz9OFu4v5N1F7wdKJF9NK3N+K1UYH1bNKcL BAJg8BqIl0X0CxZEwl/hrH1FqcyYB3jNmt8ph4p7kDPkMoHmgWOU9x/jSEG2GkM0zksw 0oag==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7C9mNcf4eRG/Fdl1oV+Wq2hoDGPxs6kqrFfsDgVR/zmt+AcDxe wsH7AJd22rBO8hhimmwgH+iIt3QJH+utUdFN6VTIWw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMaeso/NHHuth4P2ER8CkbRdoLW78buf8MJmLNBBrJcMO+lWAcshRdFPqSigayt7ZF+fEWwJcel/5w7k0ESRaUM=
X-Received: by 10.80.190.202 with SMTP id e10mr11821915edk.243.1510566366917; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 01:46:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.142.74 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 01:46:05 -0800 (PST)
From: Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:46:05 +0800
Message-ID: <CAO0Djp0Wa5NdT3JySXNg_GtmA5DncBP-8kuzeDZ4UD_EZgnSCA@mail.gmail.com>
To: tisch <6tisch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e08249e10b5b859055dda23a7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/y8I7uvjJX2drQUORQhGUWOTKM8U>
Subject: [6tisch] nbr cache recommendation
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 09:46:10 -0000
Malisa mentioned recommendations about maintaining untrusted nbr cache entries. There is another work-in-prg on lwig which takes into considerations these aspects of maintaining nbr entries for network access/auth protocol. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-nbr-mgmt-policy/ Pls check if your considerations are handled. Thanks. Regards, Rahul
- [6tisch] nbr cache recommendation Rahul Jadhav
- Re: [6tisch] nbr cache recommendation Mališa Vučinić
- Re: [6tisch] nbr cache recommendation Rahul Jadhav