[6tsch] Fwd: New Non-WG Mailing List: 6lo -- Mailing list for discussion of a WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks
Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 25 May 2013 17:13 UTC
Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2BB21F8648 for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 May 2013 10:13:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.724
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.724 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.125, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RALZu3n5o4C0 for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 May 2013 10:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x229.google.com (mail-qa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD95C21F89A6 for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 May 2013 10:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id bn16so416314qab.0 for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 May 2013 10:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:references :to:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=hnSDgz0Qq3Cg8AYc0sMhhv6gbluqPWLwVjYGcAwlnns=; b=VGSFombLnRpp1NRdL/Ii0n3WwRXKf9b8Badpj/ptewOf2FIk01QuvEZxFQ3124TcjY hXkr1jQgjzlF5RsEX1SyNP1M3epwMGF1DMjb1PsCA5qKqyVQNOwSQTCWBT8OQGBdD37Z AKbMn8Oo7XWvtb8yb6hq2+8mu8xhJqP//NQogo1al7vOLFGVXIWiR3PyVovW2qjzfoM7 u2nD+6jjALZL8lMwAEFZwWYw4eeHdWrKQqqPhR+BZKEm9tMwkIp99rHtietdy91I1ex0 e6PiPTxsAmPpLp3tbJrJfqrRw1T8XRQ93qCClaWxHlQx/aX/gwHZZpkzJM0xznIEskTD /ONA==
X-Received: by 10.224.41.3 with SMTP id m3mr125620qae.53.1369502001243; Sat, 25 May 2013 10:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-rdroms-8915.cisco.com (rtp-isp-nat1.cisco.com. [64.102.254.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u14sm19419226qao.6.2013.05.25.10.13.19 for <6tsch@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 25 May 2013 10:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 13:13:18 -0400
References: <20130524181840.1900.71091.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: 6tsch@ietf.org
Message-Id: <8A686412-6903-451E-8B46-6763EA9F38D5@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Subject: [6tsch] Fwd: New Non-WG Mailing List: 6lo -- Mailing list for discussion of a WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks
X-BeenThere: 6tsch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tsch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tsch>
List-Post: <mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 17:13:26 -0000
FYI... Begin forwarded message: > From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat@ietf.org> > Subject: New Non-WG Mailing List: 6lo -- Mailing list for discussion of a WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks > Date: May 24, 2013 2:18:40 PM EDT > To: IETF Announcement List <ietf-announce@ietf.org> > Cc: 6lo@ietf.org, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, cabo@tzi.org > > > A new IETF non-working group email list has been created. > > List address: 6lo@ietf.org > Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo/ > To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo > > Purpose: Since it was set up in 2005, the 6LoWPAN WG has created specifications > for building IPv6 networks out of devices that use the IEEE 802.15.4 > wireless network standard. This work has culminated in the recent > publication of RFC 6775, 6LoWPAN-ND, and the 6LoWPAN WG is shutting down. > > This does not mean the work in this space is done. Indeed, 6LoWPAN > produced one more document that isn't even about 802.15.4: > draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle-12.txt, the equivalent of 6LoWPAN for the low > energy mode of the Bluetooth 4.0 specification, is now in IESG > processing, waiting for the assignment of a number from the Bluetooth > SIG. A number of related drafts want to apply 6LoWPAN technology to > other constrained node network layer 2 specifications: > > -- draft-brandt-6man-lowpanz-00.txt > -- draft-ietf-6man-6lobac-01.txt > -- draft-mariager-6lowpan-v6over-dect-ule-02.txt > > Also, some additional specifications are generally regarded as useful > complements of the existing 6LoWPAN work: > > -- draft-schoenw-6lowpan-mib-03.txt > -- draft-bormann-6lowpan-ghc-05.txt > -- draft-kelsey-intarea-mesh-link-establishment-05.txt > -- draft-bormann-6lowpan-roadmap-03.txt > > Beyond that, some older proposals that the 6LoWPAN WG has not picked > up are receiving new attention: > > -- draft-thubert-6lowpan-backbone-router-03.txt > -- draft-thubert-roll-forwarding-frags-01.txt > > Finally, there are some architectural issues raised by 6LoWPAN's use > of adaptation layer fragmentation on top of a lossy radio: > > -- draft-bormann-intarea-alfi-02.txt > > As can be seen, these drafts have been addressed to a zoo of working > groups, including the sunsetting 6LoWPAN WG, the 6MAN WG, INTAREA, and > even ROLL, with the addressed WG often changing over the lifetime of a > draft. It is probably more productive to focus most of this closely > related work on a specific WG. > > One clear candidate is the 6man WG. However, that WG has a number of > other duties in maintaining IPv6 that make it subscribing to its > mailing list too onerous to the group of experts interested in > constrained node networking. It is probably worth separating out the > 6man-related work that focuses on constrained node networks. There > are, however, architectural aspects that are indeed best left in 6man > or even INTAREA. The 6Lo mailing list has been set up to organize the > discussion of a charter for a potential working group that focuses on > IP-over-foo standardization (adaptation layers) for constrained node > networks, working closely with the INT area working groups and other > IETF WGs focused on constrained node networks. > > For additional information, please contact the list administrators.