Re: [70ATTENDEES] Temperature

Scott Brim <swb@employees.org> Wed, 05 December 2007 18:57 UTC

Return-path: <70attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzzQm-00066u-Mz; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 13:57:12 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzzQj-00062c-Vz for 70attendees@ietf.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 13:57:10 -0500
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzzQj-00032O-NJ for 70attendees@ietf.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 13:57:09 -0500
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Dec 2007 13:57:09 -0500
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id lB5Iv9T6026438 for <70attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 13:57:09 -0500
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id lB5Iv3Bm002688 for <70attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 18:57:09 GMT
Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 5 Dec 2007 13:57:05 -0500
Received: from cisco.com ([161.44.11.166]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 5 Dec 2007 13:57:04 -0500
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 10:57:02 -0800
From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
To: 70attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [70ATTENDEES] Temperature
Message-ID: <20071205185702.GF60511@cisco.com>
References: <D640BECDBB586E45BD71147B55B187360103630F@STNTEXCH11.cis.neustar.com> <D3CFEF84287B46408A7F0405EE7C54577D5DC7@corvette.eu.tieto.com> <4756E977.7060808@sensinode.com> <4756ECF8.4020802@inria.fr> <37D00FBF-06CA-407C-B019-A81B3F8FF367@tzi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <37D00FBF-06CA-407C-B019-A81B3F8FF367@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Dec 2007 18:57:04.0854 (UTC) FILETIME=[A07E0F60:01C83770]
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=swb@employees.org; dkim=neutral
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aefe408d50e9c7c47615841cb314bed
X-BeenThere: 70attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: This list is used to email information pertinent to the current IETF meeting during the meeting and for 30 days after the meeting <70attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/70attendees>, <mailto:70attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/70attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:70attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:70attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/70attendees>, <mailto:70attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: 70attendees-bounces@ietf.org

Excerpts from Carsten Bormann on Wed, Dec 05, 2007 10:52:38AM -0800:
> The problem is not the temperature (which by itself is fine), but the 
> amount of airflow that is apparently needed to keep it low.

I think that's the right conclusion.  The problem seems to be
localized sources of new air, leading to uneven heat.  So Ole, you
should move over a few meters.

_______________________________________________
70ATTENDEES mailing list
70ATTENDEES@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/70attendees