Re: [75attendees] [75all] More information on the IAB Plenary

Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Wed, 29 July 2009 12:08 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: 75attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 75attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031FA3A704C for <75attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 05:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D14sgwoLRx9S; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 05:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1:76:0:ffff:4834:7147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014BE3A704E; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 05:08:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.129.85.251] (dhcp-55fb.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.85.251] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6TC87Sr010015 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 05:08:20 -0700
Message-ID: <4A703BA0.9080809@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:08:00 +0200
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IAB Chair <iab-chair@ietf.org>
References: <20090727134903.7A3C228C155@core3.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090727134903.7A3C228C155@core3.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 05:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: 75attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [75attendees] [75all] More information on the IAB Plenary
X-BeenThere: 75attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: <75attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/75attendees>, <mailto:75attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/75attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:75attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:75attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/75attendees>, <mailto:75attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:08:22 -0000

IAB Chair wrote:
> = Network Neutrality; placing the debate in IETF context
...
> What we are trying to accomplish is a more in-depth understanding of how
> policy and technical requirement and realities interact and how IETF
> technology can be designed for, or impacted by, the tussle. 


Thanks for sending your note and for scheduling this topic.

The concern that I repeatedly find distracting about this topic is that folks
have such different meanings for it.  Often a debate uses the label without
clarifying what it refers to, so that each person is really addressing a
different topic from the next.

A service provider can be neutral (or not) with respect to:

    *  Type of technical service (email, voip, web)

    *  Type of content (invoices, personal message, porn, bulk email)

    *  Type of participant (competitor, government, pornographer, red cross)

Since these are vastly different types of net neutrality (or not,) I hope that
the presentations and discussions are careful to explain what is specifically
being referred to, before exploring technical impacts.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net