IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [77attendees] ietf-nat64 experiment

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Mon, 22 March 2010 21:48 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2718F28C139 for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.826
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.826 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.546, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24=2.189, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oOauRlSKxg+2 for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [206.123.31.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7BCD28C12F for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:48:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:df8:0:72:51d0:f022:60ee:a64a] (unknown [IPv6:2001:df8:0:72:51d0:f022:60ee:a64a]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2B5C621C1B; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:48:43 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4BA8C6B6.2020603@viagenie.ca>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 06:48:38 -0700
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com>
References: <32523475.79071269139005134.JavaMail.root@zimbra> <4BA7E29D.2090404@viagenie.ca> <1d38a3351003221436k47756de4j5b1e68d7ce5a62af@mail.gmail.com> <4BA8C45F.50006@viagenie.ca> <1d38a3351003221440k1d72a3f9gf7dbf0d73b699309@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1d38a3351003221440k1d72a3f9gf7dbf0d73b699309@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 77attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [77attendees] ietf-nat64 experiment
X-BeenThere: 77attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <77attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/77attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:77attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:48:28 -0000

On 2010-03-22 14:40, Hui Deng wrote:
> so IPv4 application won't work,

Yes, that's expected.

> could we list how many applications could work in this type of connection?
> and how many application could not work in this type of connection?

Sure. We are happy to provide an environment where you may conduct this 
type of research during this week.

Thanks,
Simon
-- 
NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server        --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0               --> http://www.vcarddav.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email