Re: [78attendees] IETF Invitation letter

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 14 September 2010 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C8843A697A for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 07:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -111.185
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-111.185 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.347, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_INVITATION=-2, GB_I_LETTER=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6jrpFBpMed1L for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 07:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870983A6912 for <78attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 07:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAFIfj0xAZnwM/2dsb2JhbAChSAhxp0ObaIVABIRJhV6CfQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.56,365,1280707200"; d="scan'208";a="159060658"
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com ([64.102.124.12]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2010 14:13:49 +0000
Received: from 230.0.128.10.in-addr.arpa.noptr.antlabs.com (sjc-vpn7-156.cisco.com [10.21.144.156]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8EEDdr9023678; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:13:42 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by 230.0.128.10.in-addr.arpa.noptr.antlabs.com (PGP Universal service); Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:13:48 -0500
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by 230.0.128.10.in-addr.arpa.noptr.antlabs.com on Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:13:48 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4c8f6c22.3d9.5cdc.314446425@askcalea.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:13:30 -0500
Message-Id: <D2FF4A59-C9E9-4A19-BACA-49B1736E321F@cisco.com>
References: <4c8f6c22.3d9.5cdc.314446425@askcalea.net>
To: Norm Wright <nwright@askcalea.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: 78attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [78attendees] IETF Invitation letter
X-BeenThere: 78attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 78 attendees list <78attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/78attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:78attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:13:35 -0000

I doubt that the letter can be in text format, as it requires certain chinese stamps and letterhead. It may be necessary to have them FAX it to you.

On Sep 14, 2010, at 7:35 AM, Norm Wright wrote:

> My companies email filter detected a virus in the rely to my request for
> a letter of invitation and blocked it.  I have sent in another request asking
> for a letter of invitation in text format.
> 
> Norm Wright
> nwright@askcalea.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 78attendees mailing list
> 78attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees