Re: 50 people vs. newman
Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no Tue, 05 August 1997 13:40 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa07713; 5 Aug 97 9:40 EDT
Received: from mail.proper.com (mail.proper.com [206.86.127.224]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTPid JAA12710; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 09:38:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by mail.proper.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) id GAA07228 for ietf-822-bks; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 06:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aun.uninett.no (aun.uninett.no [129.241.1.99]) by mail.proper.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA07224 for <ietf-822@imc.org>; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 06:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dale.uninett.no by aun.uninett.no with SMTP (PP); Tue, 5 Aug 1997 15:19:39 +0200
Received: from dale.uninett.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dale.uninett.no (8.6.9/8.6.12) with ESMTP id PAA05092; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 15:19:37 +0200
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
From: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
To: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@koobera.math.uic.edu>
cc: ietf-822@imc.org
Subject: Re: 50 people vs. newman
In-reply-to: Your message of "05 Aug 1997 07:48:32 -0000." <19970805074832.22230.qmail@koobera.math.uic.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 1997 15:19:36 +0200
Message-ID: <5089.870787176@dale.uninett.no>
Sender: owner-ietf-822@imc.org
Precedence: bulk
I can't tell what you are complaining about. The Newman proposal describes a *per site* mechanism, with no effect (that I can see) on systems apart from the ones that *choose* to adopt this mechanism. With some care, it can be used *per user*, with no effect on the other users of the same mailhost. The objections seem to have been based on the idea that an Internet standard is somehow *mandatory* for the *whole network*. The difference between a Standard and an Informational is whether it is something we recommend when people do this kind of thing or whether it's simply documenting an existing practice. For Elective standards, there is *NO* requirement that people do it. A MUST in a standard just says "if you claim to follow this standard, you MUST do this". Nothing else. Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- 50 people vs. newman D. J. Bernstein
- Re: 50 people vs. newman Harald.T.Alvestrand
- Re: 50 people vs. newman Valdis.Kletnieks
- Re: 50 people vs. newman Bart Schaefer
- MLM subaddress requirement Chris Newman
- Re: MLM subaddress requirement Valdis.Kletnieks
- Re: MLM subaddress requirement Chris Newman
- Re: 50 people vs. newman D. J. Bernstein
- Re: 50 people vs. newman Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: MLM subaddress requirement Valdis.Kletnieks
- Re: 50 people vs. newman D. J. Bernstein
- Re: MLM subaddress requirement Donald E. Eastlake 3rd