Re: [82attendees] Internet connection sharing
Chris Morrow <morrowc@google.com> Wed, 16 November 2011 02:59 UTC
Return-Path: <morrowc@google.com>
X-Original-To: 82attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 82attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBB121F8F20 for <82attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:59:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.176
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.176 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.400, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, J_CHICKENPOX_54=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_56=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100, WEIRD_PORT=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IiIOJfMST3Dc for <82attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:58:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F1821F8F0D for <82attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:58:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ywt34 with SMTP id 34so7217451ywt.31 for <82attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:58:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-system-of-record; bh=ZMPpBcmQyJCMa9rp8WvdctNAiG1+fCFz9f8MFazewNE=; b=IoBtR3knnf9vUzDGaDMA2j/lidZtL61aOTFRdd/r9JH1L7WB/95LBLtnrxeBlhF3CJ YLFxfUCWIfPSvS2vheiA==
Received: by 10.100.116.14 with SMTP id o14mr155055anc.106.1321412336162; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:58:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.116.14 with SMTP id o14mr155040anc.106.1321412335766; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:58:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.150.53.4 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:58:55 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <317616CE96204D49B5A1811098BA895005C54235@XMB-AMS-110.cisco.com>
References: <CAMeF8nCRo2sHbbpX9iyhq8mPSVR0r29WjXQ_SL4ES14re09dcQ@mail.gmail.com> <317616CE96204D49B5A1811098BA895005C54235@XMB-AMS-110.cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:58:55 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMeF8nC=vDztC5WMV63gXT5zr-7RPKEjUJ3+FrMQF+YLVhcZhQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Morrow <morrowc@google.com>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: 82attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [82attendees] Internet connection sharing
X-BeenThere: 82attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <82attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/82attendees>, <mailto:82attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/82attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:82attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:82attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/82attendees>, <mailto:82attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:59:01 -0000
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com> wrote: > nmblookup -a 130.129.19.170 > > could help to identify the 'culprit' ;-) > apparently they decided to drop off the network? $ arp -an ? (130.129.16.1) at 00:00:5e:00:01:10 [ether] on wlan0 ? (130.129.19.170) at <incomplete> on wlan0 and up/down of the local interface clears the v6 tunnel state too, which is nice. (I'll remember the nmblookup for next time!) -chris >> -----Original Message----- >> From: 82attendees-bounces@ietf.org > [mailto:82attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On >> Behalf Of Chris Morrow >> Sent: mercredi 16 novembre 2011 09:48 >> To: 82attendees@ietf.org >> Subject: [82attendees] Internet connection sharing >> >> considered harmful... on the conference network >> >> >> wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:d7:9a:c0:78 >> inet addr:130.129.22.11 Bcast:130.129.23.255 > Mask:255.255.248.0 >> inet6 addr: 2001:df8:0:96:224:d7ff:fe9a:c078/64 Scope:Global >> inet6 addr: fec0::9:224:d7ff:fe9a:c078/64 Scope:Site >> inet6 addr: 2002:8281:13aa:9:224:d7ff:fe9a:c078/64 > Scope:Global >> inet6 addr: 2001:df8:0:16:224:d7ff:fe9a:c078/64 Scope:Global >> inet6 addr: fe80::224:d7ff:fe9a:c078/64 Scope:Link >> >> please user of ip address: >> >> $ whois 2002:8281:13aa:9:224:d7ff:fe9a:c078 >> >> Querying for the IPv4 endpoint 130.129.19.170 of a 6to4 IPv6 address. >> >> # >> # Query terms are ambiguous. The query is assumed to be: >> # "n 130.129.19.170" >> >> >> with mac address: >> >> $ arp -an >> ? (130.129.19.170) at 00:1a:73:a0:fd:f1 [ether] on wlan0 >> >> (you apparently have a gemtek NIC) >> >> would you kindly disable internet connection sharing? :) >> >> You aren't really sharing if you blackhole all packets :( >> $ ping6 ipv6.google.com >> PING ipv6.google.com(2404:6800:8002::67) 56 data bytes >> ^C >> --- ipv6.google.com ping statistics --- >> 3 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 1999ms >> >> >> -chris >> _______________________________________________ >> 82attendees mailing list >> 82attendees@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/82attendees >
- [82attendees] Internet connection sharing Chris Morrow
- Re: [82attendees] Internet connection sharing Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [82attendees] Internet connection sharing Chris Morrow