Re: [84attendees] Badge for bits-n-bytes ?

"Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com> Mon, 23 July 2012 22:19 UTC

Return-Path: <jhildebr@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 84attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 84attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388D411E80DC for <84attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.034, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WkInouYY0PI5 for <84attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B51D11E80BE for <84attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=jhildebr@cisco.com; l=546; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1343081960; x=1344291560; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=NM78Y0hsEyKi9Si3b7dqVV6CqF/6AR+t7SHgMRWq31s=; b=QDLnDi0eT7CD+ai46CNuKJkJR1tw/gUwr6A0HcbGLLevlmUvymqjeSGG zQcEh1qhEXb7kSSJSdAJZzwT516PdvLLYKE1Zyn7Szq1qntzOuHuL8O3+ TCnP4X+Ot6N8Ypp/+Ydahz5kkZW96PzjRQJqp9Z7rWEzZpMFxFBtBxdM8 s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag4FAAPNDVCtJXHA/2dsb2JhbABFhSu0NYEHgicSASc/EgEINjERJQIEAQ0FIodcAwycLpY1DYlOimaHOgOTdYFUiwqDHYFmgl8
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,640,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="104536497"
Received: from rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com ([173.37.113.192]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Jul 2012 22:19:20 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com [173.36.12.84]) by rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6NMJJYl028620 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:19:19 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.17]) by xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com ([173.36.12.84]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:19:19 -0500
From: "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Thread-Topic: [84attendees] Badge for bits-n-bytes ?
Thread-Index: AQHNaR2s9yj7wcX1ekqJ1MvSoivvpJc3X2aA
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:19:18 +0000
Message-ID: <CC3329BD.197FD%jhildebr@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <28C5D19A-30F1-45B4-8848-E35541562859@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
x-originating-ip: [64.101.72.220]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19060.001
x-tm-as-result: No--28.878800-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <061D8904B7149945906163EEAAC79BFB@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "84attendees@ietf.org" <84attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [84attendees] Badge for bits-n-bytes ?
X-BeenThere: 84attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 84 attendees mailing list <84attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/84attendees>, <mailto:84attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/84attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:84attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:84attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/84attendees>, <mailto:84attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:19:21 -0000

On 7/23/12 3:55 PM, "Bob Hinden" <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:


>>For the bits-n-bytes event on Thursday, will people need a badge to get
>>in?  A friend is coming into town Thursday afternoon, and I'm wondering
>>if we can both get free beer.
>
>IETF badges are required, as the event is not open to the general public
>(for obvious reasons).

Could you elaborate on what those obvious reasons are?  If I was to decide
to spend the $ for a table, I'd like as many interested people as possible
to show up.

-- 
Joe Hildebrand