Re: [90attendees] ietf-nat64 working nicely!

Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> Fri, 25 July 2014 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: 90attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 90attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C141A03F1 for <90attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ueMaRaCI0ghf for <90attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310991A031C for <90attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from h226.viagenie.ca (h226.viagenie.ca [206.123.31.226]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A053B403CA; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:51:01 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A40216BB-7EC5-4549-A118-DB457B79DEA5"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <50EB89F4-E376-4D99-94B1-44842071CF79@stuartcheshire.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:50:59 -0400
Message-Id: <D8C91FB2-A85C-43F4-A798-8D135198F862@viagenie.ca>
References: <C7816803-DB71-46B3-A451-9932A0B462BF@fugue.com> <53CC0790.9030304@jive.com> <m2k377ki5j.wl%randy@psg.com> <53CC0AB6.2090102@jive.com> <m2bnsjkhcy.wl%randy@psg.com> <50EB89F4-E376-4D99-94B1-44842071CF79@stuartcheshire.org>
To: Stuart Cheshire <ietf14@stuartcheshire.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/90attendees/CcjKPe2KNmm95bUIepnaO1It3QQ
Cc: 90attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [90attendees] ietf-nat64 working nicely!
X-BeenThere: 90attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <90attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/90attendees>, <mailto:90attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/90attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:90attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:90attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/90attendees>, <mailto:90attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 17:51:05 -0000

Le 2014-07-20 à 16:41, Stuart Cheshire <ietf14@stuartcheshire.org> a écrit :

> On 20 Jul, 2014, at 11:36, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> 
>> let me be more clear.  are we trying to provide high quality internet to conference attendees or hold a religious ceremony?
> 
> IETF meetings also serve a third function: Education. I always hope to leave IETF meetings knowing more than I did when I arrived.
> 
> Many meetings ago Marc Blanchet tapped me on the shoulder and suggested I try out the IETF-NAT64 network. I did. It took only a couple of minutes of my time to try it out. Most things on my iPhone worked fine. In fact I was amazed at how much stuff worked perfectly. A few minor things did not work perfectly. I filed bug reports for those, and iOS was improved as a result. And this happened because people like Marc Blanchet had worked to make NAT64 available at an IETF meeting so that people like me could easily try it out. This was a good outcome.

- I was not paying attention to this mailing list and someone recently told me about your message.
- thanks for your nice message, but just want to say that this "nat64 experiment" over many IETFs has been a teamwork, and I was just the "communications vehicule". so credits should go to the team.

Regards, Marc.

> 
> I would support making IPv6 with NAT64 be the default IETF meeting service, because as time goes on this is likely to be the only network many residential customers have, so our community needs to be knowledgeable about how well such networks work. For people who still need native IPv4 (hopefully a dwindling minority) there should also be an “IETF-Legacy” SSID that provides both native IPv4 and native IPv6.
> 
> As an aside, I just tried using a Google Nexus 5 running Android 4.4.4, and it refused to use the “IETF-NAT64” network, helpfully telling me that it had “Avoided poor Internet connection.”
> 
> Any other Android users seen this on the “IETF-NAT64” network?
> 
> Stuart Cheshire
> 
> <Screenshot_2014-07-20-15-16-55.png>
> _______________________________________________
> 90attendees mailing list
> 90attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/90attendees