IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [94attendees] have a safe trip from Yokohama

Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com> Fri, 06 November 2015 04:34 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5157D1B3507 for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 20:34:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3BK1qU1ktqAZ for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 20:34:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A433C1B3504 for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 20:34:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1761; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1446784459; x=1447994059; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=4XP0sjjqpPmLbVIGFWCounAE6rmPNfQJGysO9TWOnSY=; b=O7ZJPS58TUOUFsdvJwHCFlY8ybeDxihlCVwFNU+XpQD1Pworv3My19d9 AI2CubZhKl0mGB5b5wMWWqZsnvLF6S3P+7FQIbIE/O26YFzwlgX2x3UJN IcnEAF7SS01TwHt50QhfoEeLE4/QVVfAvuYm1x6JDKfneiie6KBEutpcc M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0APAgB4LTxW/4YNJK1egztTb74NAQ2BYBcKhSVKAoFAOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqENgEBBAEBATcuBgsQCxgJJQ8FEzYTiC4NwQoBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYikyBBoQqEQGEfQWOEYg3hR2HfgiBWkiDd5I3g3IfAQFChCUdNAEBg1GBQQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,250,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="44432988"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Nov 2015 04:33:56 +0000
Received: from mcast-linux1.cisco.com (mcast-linux1.cisco.com [172.27.244.121]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tA64XsQC020982 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Nov 2015 04:33:54 GMT
Received: from mcast-linux1.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by mcast-linux1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tA64XrCa028480; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 20:33:53 -0800
Received: (from eckert@localhost) by mcast-linux1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id tA64XrvX028479; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 20:33:53 -0800
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 20:33:53 -0800
From: Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>
To: Hiroshi Esaki <hiroshi@wide.ad.jp>
Message-ID: <20151106043353.GT31730@cisco.com>
References: <563C1A6F.7040105@wide.ad.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <563C1A6F.7040105@wide.ad.jp>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/94attendees/zyJLAV7syesbbIngkV31g0aVDOI>
Cc: 94attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [94attendees] have a safe trip from Yokohama
X-BeenThere: 94attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 94 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <94attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/94attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:94attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 04:34:19 -0000

Thank you very much for the great organization and picking the
perfect location. It has been way too long since 2002 ! (*)

Cheers
    Toerless

(*) Alas i could not make Hiroshima in '07, so no idea
how it compared, i only know Tokyo and Yokohama, and as much
as Tokyo is great for a lot of things, the locality in Yokohama
was IMHO better because everything was so nicely together that
we could walk to a lot of places outside the conference, and the
hotels where also all nicely close.

Oh, and the exchange rate was just perfect for shopping,
which is a great improvement over the last years ;-))

On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 12:11:43PM +0900, Hiroshi Esaki wrote:
> Dear all of 94th IETF participants,
> 
> On behalf of host (WIDE) and sponsors of this IETF meeting,
> please let me express thanks for your cooperation to have
> the meeting in Yokohama.
> 
> Please enjoy the rest of days in Japan (who are still in
> Japan) and hope/wish you enjoyed the time in Yokohama.
> 
> Have(had) a safe trip from Yokohama to home or to the
> next destination on the globe.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Hiroshi Esaki, WIDE Project
> 
> -- 
> =======================================
> 
> Hiroshi ESAKI, Ph.D
>  Professor,
>  Graduate School of Information Science and Technology,
>  The University of Tokyo,
>  102A2, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
>  Email   hiroshi@wide.ad.jp
>  TEL : +81-3-5841-7465
>  FAX : +81-3-5841-7465
>  http://www.i.u-tokyo.ac.jp/
>  http://hiroshi1.hongo.wide.ad.jp/hiroshi/index.html
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 94attendees mailing list
> 94attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/94attendees

-- 
---
Toerless Eckert, eckert@cisco.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email