Re: [AAA-DOCTORS] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4006 (4892)
<lionel.morand@orange.com> Tue, 03 January 2017 10:22 UTC
Return-Path: <lionel.morand@orange.com>
X-Original-To: aaa-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aaa-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FAD1129500; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 02:22:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.593
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.593 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAD_CREDIT=2.415, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9p0Hjn3BGQJe; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 02:22:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (mta241.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.66.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C1CB129434; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 02:22:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from opfedar05.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.7]) by opfedar26.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 51DE01C0C00; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:22:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.57]) by opfedar05.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 2F30360064; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:22:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::ec23:902:c31f:731c]) by OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::787e:db0c:23c4:71b3%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:22:25 +0100
From: lionel.morand@orange.com
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, "aaa-doctors@ietf.org" <aaa-doctors@ietf.org>, "sec-ads@ietf.org" <sec-ads@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [AAA-DOCTORS] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4006 (4892)
Thread-Index: AQHSWeL84EnpJ9EndkmU6ufRj5ZM+aEmof+w
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 10:22:25 +0000
Message-ID: <784_1483438946_586B7B62_784_1775_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E0BFC5C89@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <20161219091457.EF44BB80224@rfc-editor.org> <c046a2ac-a008-012e-4ad0-405066c26063@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <c046a2ac-a008-012e-4ad0-405066c26063@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.5]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E0BFC5C89OPEXCLILM43corp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aaa-doctors/6RPB-P7kjl67RHuxatHLwRpUebI>
Cc: "Bertz, Lyle T [CTO]" <Lyle.T.Bertz@sprint.com>, Dave Dolson <ddolson@sandvine.com>
Subject: Re: [AAA-DOCTORS] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4006 (4892)
X-BeenThere: aaa-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: AAA Doctors E-mail List <aaa-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aaa-doctors>, <mailto:aaa-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aaa-doctors/>
List-Post: <mailto:aaa-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aaa-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aaa-doctors>, <mailto:aaa-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 10:22:30 -0000
If I'm correct, this is not an erratum against 4006 but a proposed change in the draft RFC4006bis (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis-00). The original text quoted below is not in the RFC4006 but in the draft. Let me know if I'm correct. Regards, Lionel De : AAA-DOCTORS [mailto:aaa-doctors-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Benoit Claise Envoyé : lundi 19 décembre 2016 11:31 À : aaa-doctors@ietf.org; sec-ads@ietf.org Objet : [AAA-DOCTORS] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4006 (4892) Dear all, What do you think? Regards, Benoit -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4006 (4892) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 01:14:57 -0800 From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org><mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> To: Harri.Hakala@ericsson.com<mailto:Harri.Hakala@ericsson.com>, Leena.Mattila@ericsson.com<mailto:Leena.Mattila@ericsson.com>, juha-pekka.koskinen@nokia.com<mailto:juha-pekka.koskinen@nokia.com>, marco.stura@nokia.com<mailto:marco.stura@nokia.com>, John.Loughney@nokia.com<mailto:John.Loughney@nokia.com>, bclaise@cisco.com<mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>, joelja@bogus.com<mailto:joelja@bogus.com>, Bernard_Aboba@hotmail.com<mailto:Bernard_Aboba@hotmail.com>, david@mitton.com<mailto:david@mitton.com>, john.loughney@nokia.com<mailto:john.loughney@nokia.com> CC: dengzhenjie@huawei.com<mailto:dengzhenjie@huawei.com>, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org<mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4006, "Diameter Credit-Control Application". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4006&eid=4892 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: dengzhenjie <dengzhenjie@huawei.com><mailto:dengzhenjie@huawei.com> Section: 7 Original Text ------------- | PendingU | CC update answer received | Terminate | Idle | | | with result code equal to | end user's | | | | CREDIT_CONTROL_NOT_APPLICABLE | service | | Corrected Text -------------- | PendingU | CC update answer received | Grant | Idle | | | with result code equal to | service to| | | | CREDIT_CONTROL_NOT_APPLICABLE | end user | | Notes ----- Note that in Section 9, It said: when the result code in the CCA is DIAMETER_CREDIT_CONTROL_NOT_APPLICABLE 4011, it indicates that the credit-control server determines that the service can be granted to the end user but that no further credit-control is needed for the service (e.g., service is free of charge). Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC4006 (draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-cc-06) -------------------------------------- Title : Diameter Credit-Control Application Publication Date : August 2005 Author(s) : H. Hakala, L. Mattila, J-P. Koskinen, M. Stura, J. Loughney Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Authentication, Authorization and Accounting Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG . _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
- [AAA-DOCTORS] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RF… Benoit Claise
- Re: [AAA-DOCTORS] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported… lionel.morand
- Re: [AAA-DOCTORS] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported… Benoit Claise