Re: [AAA-DOCTORS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6733 (4931)

Jouni <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Thu, 09 February 2017 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: aaa-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aaa-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B545129C8F for <aaa-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 13:31:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3wbZ3YWd84FZ for <aaa-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 13:31:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22f.google.com (mail-pg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8D1412951F for <aaa-doctors@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 13:31:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id 194so3808678pgd.2 for <aaa-doctors@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 13:31:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=JvDsb5XyJobM3tkeCnQFkxlGCVLwy/NXBX4Ih6nuU08=; b=jOy4vPm91KDBkn5XI5/Biv4ZxaR9dc0Xz20F+s1dezs4dRAxoNspUGA4HlvCAtaurH 5dGUQXQ2N9QJ+OJPUdbjIHRnW0/LZpC4PiFlDCOUeGKrojZAZ6lC9adIw4fb8NSrFjWu eyQAApT0j1hMReYMUuMKntGViQ/kX4A/9c9oZChUhlNdrxVQfGS0h+B5vHhi/3XkUxIC dSBqnBdps/E9sKbNiIEOXXCkN4QVN87p4yIre4ay39W0iBvRC50nZbju9HUTTgMiwdtW zM26dBTlOoN/BDYYtuYDcd10Z8gMB3eSEX3LIclj15Yc1DLNsRcjVveQtjx6Xbt8IdbC SP9w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=JvDsb5XyJobM3tkeCnQFkxlGCVLwy/NXBX4Ih6nuU08=; b=rpop1GMp5sugZcHP+KhsLqmWF1UaOF0hXgqnnvU0ua9aAlwlwwh23Gi0uqThOxj56H GxeSvnte61RuAJmy6oK2ql7CFYEUhrQX72elL1KOb0Nn6kIgtPYBtik17MuDnrQKfOc3 6eBcBvCLtW98Ff87X8SDlzUlpvlqMzpmCsJtLnFaXogRCAntT5mMcYFAYSbt4QnzkHlF 1IqtCz9sdDpU5Atx3o8cn5Lajpr8jUdrv5MjOBp5lotWhIBwVNCuvegDlsDFdpsEsb1j GZLxDdBJEuLIksRKhexfwJbQHFdQWa0Pl8eAEF5L08ZXHc00D/nVXOL4FnpW06rp8XdG e90Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nJ9nu3674kGFAST+FT3f32r4kNxvufyEOtoipUyEeZyVinb7geaizJIvOsy2cXWw==
X-Received: by 10.98.218.9 with SMTP id c9mr5953524pfh.99.1486675862264; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 13:31:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.5] (c-24-5-144-221.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.5.144.221]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e13sm17084109pgn.38.2017.02.09.13.31.00 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Feb 2017 13:31:00 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Jouni <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2b129b48-9d8a-333c-1595-3671d43e45f1@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 13:30:56 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2D7E6B41-F065-478C-8C26-6A0DE98B0A62@gmail.com>
References: <20170209025634.0538BB80107@rfc-editor.org> <2b129b48-9d8a-333c-1595-3671d43e45f1@cisco.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aaa-doctors/QI1_gvomoHxUAKnDffvRmWsAPuM>
Cc: "aaa-doctors@ietf.org" <aaa-doctors@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [AAA-DOCTORS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6733 (4931)
X-BeenThere: aaa-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: AAA Doctors E-mail List <aaa-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aaa-doctors>, <mailto:aaa-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aaa-doctors/>
List-Post: <mailto:aaa-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aaa-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aaa-doctors>, <mailto:aaa-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 21:31:12 -0000

RFC6733 Sections 2.9 and 6.1.9 are rather clear that a relay and a proxy MUST append a Route-Record to all requests forwarded with the identity of the peer from which the request was received. There is no text that a relay or a proxy should add its own identity. If the agent were to add its own identity it would result duplicate entries of Route-Records if there are more than one agent on the path. Additionally an agent adding its own identity to a Route-Record seems to go against a MUST Section 6.7.1.

This errata should be rejected.

- Jouni

> On 09 Feb 2017, at 01:52, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> AAA doctors,
> 
> What do you think of this errata?
> 
> Regards, B.
> 
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject:	[Technical Errata Reported] RFC6733 (4931)
> Date:	Wed, 8 Feb 2017 18:56:34 -0800
> From:	RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
> To:	vf0213@gmail.com, jari.arkko@ericsson.com, john.loughney@nokia.com, glenzorn@gmail.com, bclaise@cisco.com, joelja@bogus.com, jouni.nospam@gmail.com, lionel.morand@orange.com
> CC:	luizsolis@hotmail.com, dime@ietf.org, text/plain@rfc-editor.org, charset=UTF-8@rfc-editor.org
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6733,
> "Diameter Base Protocol".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> 
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6733&eid=4931
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Luiz Solis 
> <luizsolis@hotmail.com>
> 
> 
> Section: 6.1.9
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> Figure 6.1 provides an example of message routing using the procedures
> listed in these sections.
> 
> (Origin-Host=nas.example.net)    (Origin-Host=nas.example.net)
> (Origin-Realm=example.net)       (Origin-Realm=example.net)
> (Destination-Realm=example.com)  (Destination-Realm=example.com)
>                                  (Route-Record=nas.example.net)
> 
> +------+      ------>      +------+      ------>      +------+
> |      |     (Request)     |      |      (Request)    |      |
> | NAS  +-------------------+ DRL  +-------------------+ HMS  |
> |      |                   |      |                   |      |
> +------+     <------       +------+     <------       +------+
> example.net    (Answer)   example.net     (Answer)   example.com
> (Origin-Host=hms.example.com)   (Origin-Host=hms.example.com)
> (Origin-Realm=example.com)      (Origin-Realm=example.com)
> 
>        Figure 6: Routing of Diameter messages
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Figure 6.1 provides an example of message routing using the procedures
> listed in these sections.
> 
> (Origin-Host=nas.example.net)    (Origin-Host=nas.example.net)
> (Origin-Realm=example.net)       (Origin-Realm=example.net)
> (Destination-Realm=example.com)  (Destination-Realm=example.com)
> (Route-Record=nas.example.net)*  (Route-Record=nas.example.net)
>                                  (Route-Record=drl.example.net)*
> +------+      ------>      +------+      ------>      +------+
> |      |     (Request)     |      |      (Request)    |      |
> | NAS  +-------------------+ DRL  +-------------------+ HMS  |
> |      |                   |      |                   |      |
> +------+     <------       +------+     <------       +------+
> example.net    (Answer)   example.net     (Answer)   example.com
> (Origin-Host=hms.example.com)   (Origin-Host=hms.example.com)
> (Origin-Realm=example.com)      (Origin-Realm=example.com)
> 
> *Optional.
> 
>                   Figure 6: Routing of Diameter messages
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The relay or proxy agent should append their own identity optionally in an additional Route-Record AVP (282).
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6733 (draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-33)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Diameter Base Protocol
> Publication Date    : October 2012
> Author(s)           : V. Fajardo, Ed., J. Arkko, J. Loughney, G. Zorn, Ed.
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Diameter Maintenance and Extensions
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> .
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AAA-DOCTORS mailing list
> AAA-DOCTORS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aaa-doctors