Re: [AAA-DOCTORS] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
"Ralph Droms (rdroms)" <rdroms@cisco.com> Sat, 09 February 2013 14:57 UTC
Return-Path: <rdroms@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: aaa-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aaa-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7B721F84F4 for <aaa-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 06:57:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.479
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.479 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.120, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XCgf+sWUlGKz for <aaa-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 06:57:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B949621F84C9 for <aaa-doctors@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 06:57:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4623; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1360421871; x=1361631471; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=SaGs2JXi5FrRsPR62dw42JNCN2NbwgVquzuJcPiibXY=; b=bcv7oR++ZHHzRfEuzRnmbuicolVuvtDQbRZl2GZanaWdEA3hnd6I7bUy UfuU4MdvJmpe6l7YJhNpPPTjV7vyaVutMsfCLEVug0DT4tKiWYk3YfrRx y/sXKfH+zO6aifbsHQDrU3AEYG9IbbSppwlfuzKrR9jZegs/+qz7oVqcO 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAFAJFjFlGtJV2a/2dsb2JhbABEwSQWc4IfAQEBAwE6PwUHBAIBCBEDAQIBCg4GBQsyHQgCBAENBQgBiAIGDL8ZjUELgRaCR2EDkmqUDYMGgWcIFx4
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,634,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="175267381"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Feb 2013 14:57:30 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com [173.36.12.80]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r19EvUQv001555 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 9 Feb 2013 14:57:30 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.9.188]) by xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com ([173.36.12.80]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 08:57:29 -0600
From: "Ralph Droms (rdroms)" <rdroms@cisco.com>
To: Turner Sean <turners@ieca.com>, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHOBtXHQsdOesZCAUySNJSnl/8h+w==
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 14:57:29 +0000
Message-ID: <4518F39EB578034D8C99A9B7776CDBA34A65E1@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com>
References: <20130117091306.15656.90065.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <50F7C250.4090700@cisco.com> <50FEF425.2040805@ieca.com>
In-Reply-To: <50FEF425.2040805@ieca.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.116.164.62]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <0FC87DC4D99BFB4CA451B680D06C3F6A@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 13:35:43 -0800
Cc: "aaa-doctors@ietf.org" <aaa-doctors@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [AAA-DOCTORS] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: aaa-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: AAA Doctors E-mail List <aaa-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aaa-doctors>, <mailto:aaa-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aaa-doctors>
List-Post: <mailto:aaa-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aaa-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aaa-doctors>, <mailto:aaa-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 14:57:52 -0000
I'd like to get this document cleared up before I step down as Int AD. Rev -11 has been published. Does it address the remaining Discuss points? - Ralph On Jan 22, 2013, at 3:18 PM 1/22/13, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> wrote: > Any feedback folks? I'm sitting on a discuss related to this. > > spt > > On 1/17/13 4:20 AM, Benoit Claise wrote: >> Dear AAA doctors, >> >> I updated my DISCUSS with the latest information. See below >> Regarding this COMMENT >> >> Also, it would be helpful to be explicit about the value of the >> Service-Type attribute in Access-Requests (I am assuming that this >> is no longer "Call-Check", since the User-Password attribute is >> included in the Access-Request). >> >> I believe that the AAA doctors should give clear guidelines to the >> draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib authors regarding the content of >> the Service-Type. >> If we can't, I propose not to insist on this issue. >> This is the reason why this is a COMMENT and not a DISCUSS. >> >> Feedback? >> >> Regards, Benoit >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Benoit Claise's Discuss on >> draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) >> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 01:13:06 -0800 >> From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> >> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org> >> CC: draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib@tools.ietf.org, >> softwire-chairs@tools.ietf.org >> >> >> >> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-10: Discuss >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer tohttp://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> DISCUSS: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> The AAA doctors reviewed version 10 >> >> 1. While Section 3 now does describe how authentication/authorization >> functions in a way that is compliant with RFC 2865 and 5080, there is no >> normative language and the requirements (e.g. for User-Name and >> User-Password attributes, Message-Authenticator attribute) are not >> included in Section 4.2. >> >> 2. Section 6 (Security Considerations) has a dangling sentence: >> >> ... >> >> The MAC address spoofing is possible >> >> ... >> >> OK... then what? >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> - Also, it would be helpful to be explicit about the value of the >> Service-Type attribute in Access-Requests (I am assuming that this is no >> longer "Call-Check", since the User-Password attribute is included in the >> Access-Request). >> >> - You started to use the terminology from RFC 5969, but for two terms >> only. >> It's a pity that you didn't reuse so other. >> 4.1. IPv6-6rd-Configuration Attribute >> >> 6rdPrefix >> >> The Service Provider's 6rd IPv6 prefix represented as a 16 >> octet IPv6 address. The bits after the 6rdPrefixlen number of >> bits in the prefix SHOULD be set to zero. >> >> ... >> >> 6rdBRIPv4Address >> >> One or more IPv4 addresses of the 6rd Border Relay(s) for a >> given 6rd domain. The maximum RADIUS Attribute length of 255 >> octets results in a limit of 58 IPv4 addresses. >> >>> From RFC 5969: >> 6rd prefix An IPv6 prefix selected by the service provider >> for use by a 6rd domain. There is exactly one >> 6rd prefix for a given 6rd domain. An SP may >> deploy 6rd with a single 6rd domain or multiple >> 6rd domains. >> >> ... >> >> BR IPv4 address The IPv4 address of the 6rd Border Relay for a >> given 6rd domain. This IPv4 address is used by >> the CE to send packets to a BR in order to >> reach IPv6 destinations outside of the 6rd >> domain. >> >> >> >> >> >>
- [AAA-DOCTORS] Fwd: Benoit Claise's Discuss on dra… Benoit Claise
- Re: [AAA-DOCTORS] Fwd: Benoit Claise's Discuss on… Sean Turner
- Re: [AAA-DOCTORS] Fwd: Benoit Claise's Discuss on… Sheng Jiang
- Re: [AAA-DOCTORS] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draf… Ralph Droms (rdroms)
- Re: [AAA-DOCTORS] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draf… Benoit Claise