[AAA-DOCTORS] Fwd: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4006 (4890)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Mon, 19 December 2016 10:36 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: aaa-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aaa-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CDB1294BC; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 02:36:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kqlJm0hgG9s2; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 02:36:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7405E1293F3; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 02:36:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8319; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1482143777; x=1483353377; h=subject:references:to:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=7E/NviudJ5qLi03qr4G6sh5N1bjdghmL1hxMrnUxIv4=; b=Vw3VEcjhiZR6PFe4QdrXGoCG3EmzCbBsn+kuZh22j0pjSQvrqAYXKePC gKjx4ASFw9N6SgSjqpB/eqbvNH9auyqARGy31dbYZGlz5KiwdzPyoZVG2 0vUCBr82YeXM7nMLmh5EALOkXl4N0DfjVxiXZ8gTgoVWDyvcV+FBMI1nu 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0D+AAByt1dY/xbLJq1DGhkBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYM3AQEBAQF5gQaNT3OVZII0hUKHc4UlggoqhXgCgmYUAQIBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBYiiEaAECBBI1QhwDAQIvTQIIBgEMBgIBAR6ILwMXDi6eGQGQHi+DE4dJA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHYY2gX0IglSBPYELO4FdhUEFiGIRh1CJeDW?= =?us-ascii?q?NQ4NxgXSFA4Mnhi+JYlKDZYQPHzeBAhUOFoNyDQ+BXj00AROISAEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,373,1477958400"; d="scan'208,217";a="690562229"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Dec 2016 10:36:15 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.91] (ams-bclaise-89110.cisco.com [10.60.67.91]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uBJAaFBi013115; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:36:15 GMT
References: <20161216063032.A1093B80FA4@rfc-editor.org>
To: "aaa-doctors@ietf.org" <aaa-doctors@ietf.org>, "sec-ads@ietf.org" <sec-ads@ietf.org>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20161216063032.A1093B80FA4@rfc-editor.org>
Message-ID: <cc5ed69d-60ea-a057-8168-439e61688606@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:36:15 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20161216063032.A1093B80FA4@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------C23443643D6718315630C370"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aaa-doctors/p2NXiaxXE1iScOSGtOPIaOZC31Q>
Subject: [AAA-DOCTORS] Fwd: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4006 (4890)
X-BeenThere: aaa-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: AAA Doctors E-mail List <aaa-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aaa-doctors>, <mailto:aaa-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aaa-doctors/>
List-Post: <mailto:aaa-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aaa-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aaa-doctors>, <mailto:aaa-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:36:20 -0000

And what about this one?
Simple editorial errata?

Regards, Benoit


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4006 (4890)
Date: 	Thu, 15 Dec 2016 22:30:32 -0800
From: 	RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
To: 	Harri.Hakala@ericsson.com, Leena.Mattila@ericsson.com, 
juha-pekka.koskinen@nokia.com, marco.stura@nokia.com, 
John.Loughney@nokia.com, bclaise@cisco.com, joelja@bogus.com, 
Bernard_Aboba@hotmail.com, david@mitton.com, john.loughney@nokia.com
CC: 	dengzhenjie@huawei.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org



The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4006,
"Diameter Credit-Control Application".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4006&eid=4890

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: dengzhenjie <dengzhenjie@huawei.com>

Section: 7

Original Text
-------------
    | PendingE | Failure to send; requested     | Store      | Idle     |
    |          | action DIRECT_DEBITING; DDFH   | request    |          |
    |          | equal to TERMINATE_OR_BUFFER   | with       |          |
    |          |                                | T-flag     |          |
    | PendingE | Failure to send; requested     | Store      | Idle     |
    |          | action DIRECT_DEBITING; DDFH   | request    |          |
    |          | equal to TERMINATE_OR_BUFFER   | with       |          |
    |          |                                | T-flag     |          |

Corrected Text
--------------
    | PendingE | Failure to send; requested     | Store      | Idle     |
    |          | action DIRECT_DEBITING; DDFH   | request    |          |
    |          | equal to TERMINATE_OR_BUFFER   | with       |          |
    |          |                                | T-flag     |          |

Notes
-----
the state machine  in the table of ''client, event based'' is duplicated

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

--------------------------------------
RFC4006 (draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-cc-06)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Diameter Credit-Control Application
Publication Date    : August 2005
Author(s)           : H. Hakala, L. Mattila, J-P. Koskinen, M. Stura, J. Loughney
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Authentication, Authorization and Accounting
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG
.