[AAA-DOCTORS] FW: PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package for April 9, 2009 Telechat
"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Fri, 03 April 2009 09:04 UTC
Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: aaa-doctors@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aaa-doctors@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD94A3A6968; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 02:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.092, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eGwB7aZWSH85; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 02:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CAC23A69DB; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 02:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.39,318,1235970000"; d="scan'208";a="166838090"
Received: from unknown (HELO nj300815-nj-erheast.avaya.com) ([198.152.6.5]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 03 Apr 2009 05:05:23 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.12]) by nj300815-nj-erheast-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 03 Apr 2009 05:05:22 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:05:20 +0200
Message-ID: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A040158B055@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package for April 9, 2009 Telechat
Thread-Index: Acmz3y3SSoSLlC+ORC+4RbrHrPD4QwAW3lGw
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: aaa-doctors@ietf.org, "MIB Doctors (E-mail)" <mib-doctors@ietf.org>, ops-dir@ietf.org, dns-dir@ietf.org
Cc: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Subject: [AAA-DOCTORS] FW: PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package for April 9, 2009 Telechat
X-BeenThere: aaa-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: AAA Doctors E-mail List <aaa-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aaa-doctors>, <mailto:aaa-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aaa-doctors>
List-Post: <mailto:aaa-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aaa-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aaa-doctors>, <mailto:aaa-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 09:04:22 -0000
Please find below the preliminary agenda of the 4/9 telechat. Please send your comments and concerns until Wednesday 4/8 the latest. Also note that several Working Groups are on the agenda of the telechat for discussions and approval. Please copy Ron on your mails. I will be missing this telechat because of a short vacation (4/7 to 4/12). Dan 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item o draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp-19.txt GIST: General Internet Signalling Transport (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 9 Note: Please check your comment field so that it doesn't contain old text! RE-evaluate your ABSTAIN positions. All that stays in ABSTAIN please indicate in the comment field that you have performed this re-evaluation. Pleas also include some motivation behind your decision. Token: Magnus Westerlund o draft-ietf-behave-turn-13.txt Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN): Relay Extensions to Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 9 Token: Magnus Westerlund o draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-capabilities-03.txt LDP Capabilities (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 9 Token: Ross Callon o draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-channel-bindings-06.txt Clarifications and Extensions to the GSS-API for the Use of Channel Bindings (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 9 Note: proto writeup received... Token: Tim Polk o draft-ietf-softwire-security-requirements-07.txt Softwire Security Analysis and Requirements (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 9 Token: ? o draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-proto-11.txt Network Time Protocol Version 4 Protocol And Algorithms Specification (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 9 Token: ? o draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-mib-05.txt Definitions of Managed Objects for Network Time Protocol Version 4 (NTPv4) (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 9 Token: ? o draft-ietf-ccamp-path-key-ero-04.txt RSVP Extensions for Path Key Support (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 9 Token: Ross Callon o draft-ietf-pce-global-concurrent-optimization-10.txt Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Requirements and Protocol Extensions In Support of Global Concurrent Optimization (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 9 Token: Ross Callon 2.1.2 Returning Item o draft-ietf-ippm-duplicate-07.txt A One-Way Packet Duplication Metric (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1 Token: Lars Eggert 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item NONE 2.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item o draft-ietf-lemonade-streaming-10.txt Streaming Internet Messaging Attachments (Informational) - 1 of 1 Note: Glenn Parsons is document shepherd Token: Alexey Melnikov 3.1.2 Returning Item NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item NONE 3.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd. Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Item o draft-despres-6rd-02.txt IPv6 Rapid Deployment on IPv4 infrastructures (6rd) (Informational) - 1 of 1 Token: Jari Arkko 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review o Multiple Interfaces (mif) - 1 of 1 Token: Jari Arkko 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval o Locator/ID Separation Protocol (lisp) - 1 of 3 Token: Jari Arkko o Session Initiation Protocol Core (sipcore) - 2 of 3 Token: Cullen Jennings o Dispatch (dispatch) - 3 of 3 Token: Cullen Jennings
- [AAA-DOCTORS] FW: PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package … Romascanu, Dan (Dan)