Re: [AAA-WG]: Wrapping up Diameter EAP...

Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com> Wed, 12 May 2004 14:41 UTC

Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu (postfix@trapdoor.merit.edu [198.108.1.26]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA11012 for <aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 12 May 2004 10:41:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id 9FCDC91271; Wed, 12 May 2004 10:41:33 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: aaa-wg-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu
Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id 672C691273; Wed, 12 May 2004 10:41:33 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: aaa-wg@trapdoor.merit.edu
Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2902091271 for <aaa-wg@trapdoor.merit.edu>; Wed, 12 May 2004 10:41:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id E409F59145; Wed, 12 May 2004 10:41:30 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: aaa-wg@merit.edu
Received: from internaut.com (h-66-167-171-107.sttnwaho.covad.net [66.167.171.107]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1EC5916E for <aaa-wg@merit.edu>; Wed, 12 May 2004 10:41:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (aboba@localhost) by internaut.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i4CEjHU25513; Wed, 12 May 2004 07:45:17 -0700
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 07:45:17 -0700
From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
To: Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com
Cc: aaa-wg@merit.edu
Subject: Re: [AAA-WG]: Wrapping up Diameter EAP...
In-Reply-To: <052E0C61B69C3741AFA5FE88ACC775A6010C3AA8@esebe023.ntc.nokia.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.56.0405120741200.24794@internaut.com>
References: <052E0C61B69C3741AFA5FE88ACC775A6010C3AA8@esebe023.ntc.nokia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu
Precedence: bulk

A question:

RFC 3579 requires that a RADIUS client be able to differentiate one EAP
session from another.  As we've been discussing in EAP WG, this may be
tricky in the case where an EAP authentication is restarted via an
EAPOL-Start message.

I don't see any text in this draft equivalent to RFC 3579, Section 2.6.1
that describe how Diameter handles this problem.  I suspect that Diameter
should be able to do better than RADIUS, but guidance on how the server
should behave would be helpful.

On Wed, 12 May 2004 Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've posted an intermediate version of draft-ietf-aaa-eap-06.a
> at http://www.cs.hut.fi/~peronen/eap/diameter_eap.html
> together with a HTML diff from version -05.
>
> This is supposed to resolve all remaining open issues, but
> I would encourage everyone to check if they are OK with
> the changes.
>
> If I don't get any complaints, I'll post this as -06 some time
> next week and ask the WG chairs to send it to the IESG.
>
> Best regards,
> Pasi
>