Is this topic dead?

Clifford Neuman <bcn@isi.edu> Wed, 13 July 1994 01:23 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14422; 12 Jul 94 21:23 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14418; 12 Jul 94 21:23 EDT
Received: from venera.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05482; 12 Jul 94 21:23 EDT
Received: from darkstar.isi.edu by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-14) id <AA06367>; Tue, 12 Jul 1994 16:39:27 -0700
Received: by darkstar.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-17) id <AA24244>; Tue, 12 Jul 1994 16:39:14 -0700
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 1994 16:39:14 -0700
Message-Id: <199407122339.AA24244@darkstar.isi.edu>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Clifford Neuman <bcn@isi.edu>
To: Pope@secstan.demon.co.uk
Cc: ietf-aac@isi.edu
In-Reply-To: Nick Pope's message of Tue, 12 Jul 94 21:54:36 GMT <65@secstan.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Is this topic dead?

   Date: Tue, 12 Jul 94 21:54:36 GMT
   From: Nick Pope <Pope@secstan.demon.co.uk>

   Has there been any interest in progressing the proposed API?  

No, and unfortunately again, it hasn't been done sufficiently far in
advance to deal with this at the Toronto IETF.  However, I am hoping
to get a document together by the IETF even though we won't be
meeting.  You've heard this before though.

	~ Cliff