Re: Mailserver URL proposal
Dirk Herr-Hoyman <hoymand@gate.net> Tue, 26 July 1994 14:30 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02631; 26 Jul 94 10:30 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02627; 26 Jul 94 10:30 EDT
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06641; 26 Jul 94 10:30 EDT
Received: by mocha.bunyip.com (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA15446 on Tue, 26 Jul 94 09:25:10 -0400
Received: from inca.gate.net by mocha.bunyip.com with SMTP (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA15440 (mail destined for /usr/lib/sendmail -odq -oi -furi-request uri-out) on Tue, 26 Jul 94 09:25:02 -0400
Received: (from hoymand@localhost) by inca.gate.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id JAA233582; Tue, 26 Jul 1994 09:24:06 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Dirk Herr-Hoyman <hoymand@gate.net>
Message-Id: <199407261324.JAA233582@inca.gate.net>
Subject: Re: Mailserver URL proposal
To: "Stephen R. van den Berg" <berg@pool.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 1994 09:24:05 -0400
Cc: uri@bunyip.com
In-Reply-To: <9407251112.AA07032@tabaqui> from "Stephen R. van den Berg" at Jul 25, 94 01:12:06 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 1626
> > Marc VanHeyningen <mvanheyn@cs.indiana.edu> wrote: > > I'm not sure how much I missed about this discussion, but, here are > some things that I had in mind: > > 1. Having read the mailserver proposal I got the impression that you intend > for the server to actually send the mail. I think this definitely is the > wrong way to go. The client should be calling sendmail (or whatever), > this also resolves the problem of somehow passing the sender address, since > it will be generated by sendmail (who is actually the only one capable of > deciding what it should look like). > The client (or whatever agent is using this URL) would form a mail message and then pass it onto a mail transport agent, such as sendmail. This is really no different than what a typical mail user agent (such as elm or eudora) does. > 2. The mailto: URL already allows for arbitray headers to be defined. > What about implementing the "mailserver" URL like this: > > <FORM METHOD="POST" ACTION="mailto:berg@pool.informatik.rwth-aachen.de"> > <MH HIDDEN>Subject: WWW Questionaire</MH> > <MB HIDDEN> > This will be in the body > of the mail > </MB> > <P ALIGN=CENTER><INPUT TYPE=submit> > </FORM> > > Not quite Mark. This is html+, which is specific to the 2nd generation WWW clients. This works fine in that context. But, we are designing a general standard here, not WWW. Peter D's comments on this matter are exactly my own. -- Dirk Herr-Hoyman | Lake Worth, Florida, USA | hoymand@gate.net | +1.407.540.8309 |
- Re: Mailserver URL proposal Dirk Herr-Hoyman