Re: [Ace] Status of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport

[Daniel Migault <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

I am just checking if the new version has been shared. I do not necessarily
need to be in the loop, but I just want to make sure the document to
progress over the last needed micro bit that remains to be fixed.

Yours,
Daniel

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 5:22 PM Daniel Migault <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Thanks for the response. I confirm no active discussion in the WG.
> Yours,
> Daniel
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 5:18 PM Paul Wouters <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 2:54 PM Daniel Migault <[e-mail]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Mohit,
>>>
>>> I am just wondering if there is any version you can share with us that
>>> solves Paul's comment. The draft cut off has passed so you won't be able to
>>> publish the draft yourself. I suggest you shar eit there and if that
>>> addresses all comments either Paul can request a publication or you will be
>>> able to publish it the monday the IETF starts - whichever Paul thinks is
>>> easier.
>>>
>>
>> We don't have to wait for the Monday, as the changes aren't changing core
>> aspects of the document and I don't think it is currently actively
>> discussed in the WG,
>> as it waiting for a change for me to start IETF Last Call.
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>>> Yours,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 2:12 PM Mohit Sahni <[e-mail]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Hendrik
>>>> I am working on resolving Paul's comments. Hopefully I will resolve and
>>>> publish the next version by Monday March 6th.
>>>>
>>>> -Mohit
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 10:31 PM Brockhaus, Hendrik <
>>>> [e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mohit
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Saurabh
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks’ a lot, for writing the document
>>>>> draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport. I really appreciate your work and use
>>>>> it in my documents that update the Certificate Management Protocol. In the
>>>>> meantime, all three documents (draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-algorithms,
>>>>> draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates, and draft-ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile)
>>>>> are in RFC Editor queue.
>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C458
>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.rfc-2Deditor.org_cluster-5Finfo.php-3Fcid-3DC458&d=DwMFAg&c=V9IgWpI5PvzTw83UyHGVSoW3Uc1MFWe5J8PTfkrzVSo&r=J7DgfMyeL26OZuy8d3qTy_h24Ff1NatxSKMgDUj2Kxg&m=g73vpLN1d8vop4qNIObfQrZU9dURHLU-mPZXmUGSYpvVENKqDwPaQ9TIa2E41iGG&s=a0Mo2DY4roTHbfGVxO7KE-ZA_xbzMWVzL7VlQTGh8jc&e=>
>>>>>
>>>>> The publication of these documents requires also
>>>>> draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport to reach that state.
>>>>>
>>>>> I feel like little work is required tackling the comments from the ADs
>>>>> during the final reviews. From my experience, quick response and timely
>>>>> updates of the draft ease the review and approval process a lot and also
>>>>> reduce the time you have to invest on this work.
>>>>>
>>>>> Saying this, I would appreciate seeing more activity on this draft. If
>>>>> you need support from my side, I am welcome to help, please feel free to
>>>>> contact me.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> With best regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Hendrik
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel Migault
>>> Ericsson
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Daniel Migault
> Ericsson
>


-- 
Daniel Migault
Ericsson