[Ace] draft-ietf-ace-actors
Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Fri, 15 September 2017 09:47 UTC
Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B84F13303F for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 02:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VZ4-6lmmnEJL for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 02:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6187132EDA for <Ace@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 02:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.91.203] ([193.43.158.242]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LjZhg-1dHGYA0iaW-00bYyV for <Ace@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 11:47:50 +0200
To: "Ace@ietf.org" <Ace@ietf.org>
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Openpgp: id=071A97A9ECBADCA8E31E678554D9CEEF4D776BC9
Message-ID: <bc0926a0-c6c9-b02d-f924-09252f5a32ac@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 11:47:49 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:9XF2ZTJZ9DKvUVWXR6a5b864LHxz9HLeFR4kBgnOGuj8NCc4gTN SLXnKkL/TnBB/IGUD0Tdn2ww6WWeSmtr7qSTtkVXf5Th26TjqZ2Huhc/7P5OFKVz+kVt54L CWjRi23nnaX1gQeYhZcDiR7aJfAqMtKo832BLPKiF/sz3KHuxXM/l7rR7bxbw3W4XW8jvb1 2Enfq6VXoZ61tywsKlwyg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:7CuEZJqVYos=:u9uxB8oUPD/yRTF05gdHC2 cPCji/Z/1PkQWrjTK1CCrGoBDQcOHr1kTfD8+KAoClXIv8DPULomrDmdqqxbX0XTitQYYQ92m kjZn8PdkfYjo9UXcmAR8RfQ6brIYNwQ6yH8YxqmBUJ24JbSXJBy5sG1xGsMeQzAnf8CY73PRA /O+Q84znoOPkbP3mn5Abvs7esByqsBgB83jp8tMb2kzTJjreauZVYvSYN9nbcWox8Nk1keuDs uNkANeFL9HeVjQy0ieIsFOm+pL46IOEf1wM299LbKhpYD6I5fhot7RoGp2JJtLPHT349jJ5XK LsFz870SSCa3JHHCkr4Q2d61JWl6OG7lsRTxTKoswsJIjEQBheMg4yEsbaZvOOY0OKqXuDtcr /Qvm4WNFjGthcIPK/o61nSfJwnRga3BrjRQgi7ls3y4ku7hjwnzJPfyCYzWouQU4wWyQRQ1z8 Zd+3rVkqR3jZpjNX1gFHVb4AnPl38QFDKgzE2N1M3Qs7WtVkNP2UxF15zCiv2SJFCAUDO3bTu /5mMszDBjDkjB3oC6zVgZjOkFjvok41p5c3bIrbMPMxhrnnF36sLenpWphr8HzSP5lOGEUT3w 10ChukOzuHa96W5TAN5emRvU8QeHynoCerjPcyQ21N71DA2+3xqhns2whX8We2aSMWImp97iM he9sSzwfLBJh92FN7gBp22pfNBma2wK7HAkqvXReNZczeigT0bLPR9ctMzuRL2n5csDl+rMMr XGpYSEu2NKuRk3gKCYnbsc/wkHKGxBG+mfpSrtGgddw7NwABHEQOgIiE7dT0BkCrrmh3sFmD7 bWq3cr+HCAt1/PD4wVHNagwTSchvxgGVGGH51z9dhybVgWMp4w=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/E6pFd0IR0NwRQ3uijYdYUDfRD1w>
Subject: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-actors
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 09:47:54 -0000
Hi all, the actor document has not seen any progress for a long time (despite it being a working group document). There is clearly a lack of interest from the group and the focus has shifted to other documents instead. So, I am wondering how we should proceed with this work. I see a few options and would like to hear your thoughts: 1) Stop the work and declare it "overtaken by events" 2) Find a new editor with sufficient energy (assuming that there is such a person in the working group). Other suggestions are welcome! I fear that just keep hoping that the authors will progress the document isn't enough. Thoughts? Ciao Hannes
- [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-actors Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-actors Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-actors Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-actors Ludwig Seitz
- Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-actors Ludwig Seitz
- Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-actors Ludwig Seitz
- Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-actors Ludwig Seitz