[Ace] [core] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-tiloca-core-multicast-oscoap-00.txt

Marco Tiloca <marco@sics.se> Wed, 12 October 2016 08:12 UTC

Return-Path: <marco@sics.se>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2C41296FA for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 01:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sics.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1mQBCzgQb4gA for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 01:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x231.google.com (mail-lf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E78F1296F1 for <Ace@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 01:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id x79so67512164lff.0 for <Ace@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 01:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sics.se; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=rwte14AeHecS+6MORirmYpvs5IB5AkY3EV38+abFrD8=; b=QG1WbMB56Wc9rCsoMmG+doQbz+KpEGbSG+tdXsCSlkhBsm9nSe++bFrtpoPULBzrvE +72ZC37pLQFyyJKgTNL9GlFcAyS8mlTKt0hmJAjMADs0mun5fCoYZ9/abIS7UR1zm6mX wolcdslJ+PYjePo8X+CrDC0C7Q0TkTxMUipG9FtMAYruqCy9Hf7LappyDOPmlFUKKRmQ Q98AMnGP/MRRomIVVjOL+lXNkG06xwVZP85z5bs31eTfthtUtjDp9kCQlSxeFFyo42qf R0pxQyI4u3Qx/D1kIDsssovevXnoM0/ShRvEhnXdGn2P8hfR+Vu7DRi+oYlc6lPFBaCu iYAg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=rwte14AeHecS+6MORirmYpvs5IB5AkY3EV38+abFrD8=; b=QhgW2zJXfmp8XXkfopZO/e0/6idB6uCmI1Vu+fStYGHSrPsJTsTjV+kb5q8wFdU7sx Wpd5SzqhTTmQCGj5ZMZuHE2mtOae5fBywjwUJnft5NM0VJz5FN0lTncpSkP/qG71dHJG 2ihGGRX0LvyCxCNJGG2RAHpcO65plxYnvlFeqwzb32eRqmtUOCaGUVwkKPxIgfzRdzTr HD8VhLr8zlVbrV1RZ+tHKVYjVka37P6605/e3mbvijwVfwZ/ITiw7JnqR1m5GdAx0lYy u50oQwOY/ZB9/hh3gkpWZt3kImRwxjiqZsKUu+boRtUWfM6HOhS8B2Z7MX0z9vweSnzK N8Nw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RmDKX/k17SO8STkcGbO/IbrVZfTYKhTk6tTu3vYnZJ6+DdxvdR+54xRn4uNlL1FqIiJB9c42Y0IQnA0ELYV
X-Received: by 10.25.139.195 with SMTP id n186mr6103529lfd.97.1476259922123; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 01:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.134.213 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 01:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Marco Tiloca <marco@sics.se>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:12:01 +0200
Message-ID: <CABFpCtAqw53V9VfReuF+w3yQU+d+rhG9Ga_e4BX3KsEjGAjXzQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: core@ietf.org, Ace@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ebaa6413c47053ea68ced"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/ENnblrd3oEd5swMIWCGB6KZ400U>
Subject: [Ace] [core] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-tiloca-core-multicast-oscoap-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 08:12:17 -0000

Dear CoRE/ACE,

We have submitted a draft on secure group communication for CoAP addressing
security for the setting of a multicast CoAP request with unicast responses
as described in RFC7390.

This draft builds on the recently updated version of OSCOAP, extended with
mandatory Sender ID and multiple Recipient Contexts. It also enables source
authentication with asymmetric signatures implemented as counter signatures
included with the COSE objects defined by OSCOAP.

We hope that by submitting now we could get some first discussion to allow
updates before the cutoff.

This draft provides the missing link between
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-somaraju-ace-multicast and OSCOAP.

Best regards,
Marco


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:27 AM
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-tiloca-core-multicast-oscoap-00.txt
To: Marco Tiloca <marco@sics.se>, Goeran Selander <
goran.selander@ericsson.com>, Francesca Palombini <
francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>



A new version of I-D, draft-tiloca-core-multicast-oscoap-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Francesca Palombini and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-tiloca-core-multicast-oscoap
Revision:       00
Title:          Secure group communication for CoAP
Document date:  2016-10-12
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          15
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-tiloca-core-
multicast-oscoap-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tiloca-core-
multicast-oscoap/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tiloca-core-multicast-
oscoap-00


Abstract:
   This document describes a method for application layer protection of
   messages exchanged with the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)
   in a group communication context.  The proposed approach relies on
   Object Security of CoAP (OSCOAP) and the CBOR Object Signing and
   Encryption (COSE) format.  All security requirements fulfilled by
   OSCOAP are maintained for multicast CoAP request messages and related
   unicast CoAP response messages.  Source authentication of all
   messages exchanged within the group is ensured, by means of digital
   signatures produced through asymmetric private keys of sender devices
   and embedded in the protected CoAP messages.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat