IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ace] AD review of draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-12 part 2

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Mon, 09 September 2019 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06641201EA; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 09:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dxDegyeZpxbC; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 09:42:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5914212081B; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 09:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id x89GgfPm023673 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 9 Sep 2019 12:42:43 -0400
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 11:42:40 -0500
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: draft-ietf-ace-coap-est.all@ietf.org, ace@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20190909164240.GJ18198@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <20190828233639.GI84368@kduck.mit.edu> <027701d55ebf$994184b0$cbc48e10$@augustcellars.com> <edcbc2a243cc7118e35aec77b2e1599c@bbhmail.nl> <20190901204340.GG27269@kduck.mit.edu> <6b482aaed0ce510c503984dfbac7286c@bbhmail.nl> <7cd78133c263214be535ec36734f7ec1@bbhmail.nl> <30070.1568030052@dooku.sandelman.ca> <20190909144232.GH18198@kduck.mit.edu> <7801.1568047103@dooku.sandelman.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7801.1568047103@dooku.sandelman.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/FH9Jkgo8w-PAuFAoia98-Cr5D9E>
Subject: Re: [Ace] AD review of draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-12 part 2
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 16:42:51 -0000

On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 05:38:23PM +0100, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 
> Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote:
>     >> I think that we could go to TLS Exporter right now, but it would take
>     >> some work.
> 
>     > I'd rather have both classic-EST and coap-EST benefit than just
>     > coap-EST.
> 
> So you'd agree to deferring this to a document (maybe in LAMPS?) that would
> Updates: 7030 and this document.

Right.

-Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email