[Ace] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8392 (5710)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 17 January 2024 02:22 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C9DC1519AF; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 18:22:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.657
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.657 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jbBG5lIVpyqV; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 18:22:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCF16C15198C; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 18:22:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id A6DB41BA410B; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 18:22:25 -0800 (PST)
To: felipe@felipegasper.com, mbj@microsoft.com, erik@wahlstromstekniska.se, erdtman@spotify.com, Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: paul.wouters@aiven.io, iesg@ietf.org, ace@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240117022225.A6DB41BA410B@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 18:22:25 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/XTqu9mioNHuTWN64uUgVckgEdbg>
Subject: [Ace] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8392 (5710)
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 02:22:29 -0000
The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC8392, "CBOR Web Token (CWT)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5710 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Technical Reported by: Felipe Gasper <felipe@felipegasper.com> Date Reported: 2019-04-29 Held by: Paul Wouters (IESG) Section: 1.1 Original Text ------------- In JSON, maps are called objects and only have one kind of map key: a string. CBOR uses strings, negative integers, and unsigned integers as map keys. Corrected Text -------------- In JSON, maps are called objects and only have one kind of map key: a string. CBOR allows other data types, such as strings, negative integers, and unsigned integers, as map keys. Notes ----- The text as it stands risks an interpretation that CBOR limits map keys to integers and strings; per discussion on the CBOR mailing list, this is not the case. -------------------------------------- RFC8392 (draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-15) -------------------------------------- Title : CBOR Web Token (CWT) Publication Date : May 2018 Author(s) : M. Jones, E. Wahlstroem, S. Erdtman, H. Tschofenig Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Ace] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8392 (… RFC Errata System