[Ace] draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-08 / draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Sun, 01 October 2017 09:40 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237AA134707 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Oct 2017 02:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yCPzVRxLfiSF for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Oct 2017 02:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99177134706 for <Ace@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Oct 2017 02:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.91.203] ([80.92.122.248]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LZzKf-1dbbAQ2FET-00loou for <Ace@ietf.org>; Sun, 01 Oct 2017 11:39:59 +0200
To: "Ace@ietf.org" <Ace@ietf.org>
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Openpgp: id=071A97A9ECBADCA8E31E678554D9CEEF4D776BC9
Message-ID: <bb93405a-5a14-ab75-0902-8d21eabeb6fa@gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2017 11:39:58 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ltrBMxObrZvVJ1821YLmKb6aRg2tagCMjPXw4F/9AtM9kcLBq6E U2V6txjN9sg6qoizYlE47XSKt0VYqZpW9m/Z7H0EK/zrpyVyVJUhv5U/V9Nutx1NYiksnir LpXVcmbICZu8FvbolMlM8l/F+QLpeij7KGcNW1fFVczQalDkbS/VC8D/pe2CkeOQ5eLW5Z3 u60sYnI7sKNqG6nT6D+jA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:xeIidVxBYaw=:8Kst+ouhwXYQUTPAsItd9o 8HnF3UG4IafhWvg9P6fJlwe41e1m3R7MZOOXopLzU0owSq7kBDNBK4vJ10AdGAzn8dOCYFkOE wZUXMfGME06coJe20b9NYaCVXXelr+aDW6/hOO7LzW2Il0YeFilxSk6d1dYbN7ADusZDgnYGA S/vuphVUIlC1zOO8ZbUIVNFpRJ6Fz5/4BG0qJSsryTjPIvVi4UYrSkCv44vYEsol0HVyOFo5/ u2X4MkgEvKNwV31MuTbGS4aalWtfSJaiw90o4DUfTiCTpl5rOih9ZhP5R20qR8zPNKwezwuqk Peo8OsRc+vFq8hG1FZMHEI3nBqG3X0tANaEyN0ot2dJZHiFzMI8BJEX3YyurDPYn5kHaTlrRh FiXiOkDwofdwUxlXogq6e2ISrmT5CzJNjVxQYMoeY2fcFLd1T2bT7MFhYBNEf3xBieI32DeJ+ jnWEcVdy0YGVJ9aWIHO2eHDp5dFSwmCsKAEl5Pw1wrzKWF+kRXxbflhGz4gnI0F4LS550+K6n QxQKY8tkI/knE7UK5NOmXBX5QXy6ZM98Lm05gl/viTqpRb983IU4/sMfwg7l3VVZ9FE11qp0j pjC1tVRRgC5IKgTqoJAgO88Orpv53kz42T+k7/cppOCxVvC0FuivEYd322hKK+a8Wz+ao5pOi n8e9gWXf5ohhrK+gI8Gf4qjmcKEeFkue4+4FvhiDcqfVIkxA1+XhCq4Rtq9gnhxDnShOc2NIX jwOPrdGAbqNegi8odZwOX4AbhnEpXKNfqadwL+Z7ebz8P7ox/G3npyAG/lHEr6eYCDejOeVRD OxSmUFcJPPyA8US19msKPRlP2Km6qiWXv5F349zbAKn4CrtMwo=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/ZtQ6Lb5Ck5JEGyTP5K3qnFYMiLM>
Subject: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-08 / draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2017 09:40:03 -0000

[Chair hat off]

Hi all,

after reading draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize I was wondering how the RS
determines what key to use to decrypt noticed that none of the examples
in  draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-08 and in
draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession use some form of key id to allow
finding the appropriate key.

Maybe I overlooked it or was this intentional?

Ciao
Hannes