Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanderstok-ace-est
peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Fri, 02 February 2018 08:45 UTC
Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA84E1275F4 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 00:45:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xmWvl9CuvXUk for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 00:45:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lb1-smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net (lb1-smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net [194.109.24.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BF8A1200FC for <ace@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 00:45:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl ([IPv6:2001:888:0:22:194:109:20:212]) by smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net with ESMTPA id hWyKeX5Dg3A62hWyKeTB6L; Fri, 02 Feb 2018 09:45:25 +0100
Received: from AMontpellier-654-1-119-113.w90-0.abo.wanadoo.fr ([90.0.134.113]) by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Fri, 02 Feb 2018 09:45:24 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2018 09:45:24 +0100
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: "Beck, Stefan" <S.Beck@osram.com>
Cc: ace@ietf.org
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
Mail-Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
In-Reply-To: <DB6PR07MB341528B44D1320B3525C005C85FA0@DB6PR07MB3415.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <010f01d39a08$255723c0$70056b40$@augustcellars.com> <DB6P121MB005604AACB19B414668CE0FF8DFA0@DB6P121MB0056.EURP121.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <B36EFBB4-DC5F-456A-9BC0-4D75617BC7B5@ri.se> <DB6PR07MB341528B44D1320B3525C005C85FA0@DB6PR07MB3415.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <1e58208aba210d1473afd8ed6b56508a@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfEpk8aRM4yO/Cl/PbTT26dSHIdsQoJY/jnejnurdpxKHUOz4CzEeF394QFevlr996wLQtSDPOdZdJySZjGaXE7zpQGiY9IbNZ5gumbszhcW8qSyc4aRT crnoUMp8J6fsr5eLwM6QQBm5aZYz6oc93fBhrmogNf5BLBpoe/CYdrgRS1IzN4dbtAIKkb5hvsVJS9KHO5POlU7QzUGz/YSf7706NBKop48cvOu25BaRDD3C
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/a8UrBCZNmkIionUYlBFgkLGmn_s>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanderstok-ace-est
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2018 08:45:31 -0000
Hi Stefan, Thanks for the support. I see your point of view; We will look at the text to avoid suggesting that EST/https and EST/coaps cannot exist together. Peter Beck, Stefan schreef op 2018-02-01 12:51: > +1 > I support adoption, as it perfectly complements the existing EST work. > > So far, just one general comment: > The draft could emphasize (e.g. in the intro) that coexistence of EST > and EST-coaps is supported in target deployments. And you even may > have a combination of constrained devices in a non-constrained network > and vice versa. > If that matches the authors’ view, then some general statements need > to be adapted. Two examples see below > > Stevie > > > 1. Abstract: > "This allows low-resource constrained devices to re-use existing EST > functionality. Example low-resource use cases for EST are: secure > bootstrapping and certificate enrollment." > > Well, to me those are the two main use cases for non-constrained > devices using EST, too. So I would write: > "This allows low-resource constrained devices to re-use existing EST > functionality to implement use cases such as secure bootstrapping and > certificate enrollment." > > > 2. Chapter 3.5 (Deployment limits): > 2a. " Although EST-coaps paves the way for the utilization of EST for > constrained devices on constrained networks..." > --> s?on?and/or? > > 2b. " EST-coaps is intended to ensure that EST works for networks of > constrained devices that choose to limit their communications stack to > UDP/CoAP." > --> Remove "networks of" > > --------------------- > From: Ace [mailto:ace-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Shahid Raza > Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2018 11:56 AM > To: Sandeep Kumar <sandeep.kumar@philips.com> > Cc: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>; ace@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanderstok-ace-est > > As a co-author, I also strongly support the adoption of this draft as > a WG document. Recall that , we already have an implementation of this > draft, both in constrained devices (SICS Contiki) and in the Nexus CA > software. Recently, we have also implemented the "integration of this > draft into LwM2M", which is part of the latest LwM2M release. > > Best, > Shahid > > Shahid Raza, PhD > Director Security Lab and Expert Researcher > RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden > Division ICT - RISE SICS > > Isafjordsgatan 22 / Kistagången 16 > 16440, Kista Stockholm > Mobile: +46 768831797 > shahid.raza@ri.se > http://www.shahidraza.net > http://www.sics.se > The RISE institutes Innventia, SP and Swedish ICT have merged in order > to become a stronger research and innovation partner for businesses > and society. > > > On 1 Feb 2018, at 11:40, Sandeep Kumar <sandeep.kumar@philips.com> > wrote: > > As co-author, I support adoption of the draft as WG document. There is > need in industry and multiple standardization bodies for this draft. > > Regards > Sandeep > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ace [mailto:ace-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jim Schaad > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 9:23 PM > To: ace@ietf.org > Subject: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanderstok-ace-est > > This is the start of a two week call for input on the adoption of the > WG of the document draft-vanderstok-ace-est. The document has been > presented at the last two meetings and has some significant recent > updates to respond to feedback. There seemed to be support at the > last F2F to adopt. > > Please provide feedback to the list/chairs if you believe that this > document > should be adopted as a WG document. The adoption call will end on > Feb 13 > 2018. > > Jim > > > _______________________________________________ > Ace mailing list > Ace@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace > > ________________________________ > The information contained in this email may be confidential and/or > legally protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely > for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are > hereby notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or > reproduction of this email is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. > If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by > return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original email. > > _______________________________________________ > Ace mailing list > Ace@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace > > > _______________________________________________ > Ace mailing list > Ace@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
- [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanderstok-… Jim Schaad
- Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanders… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanders… Sandeep Kumar
- Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanders… Shahid Raza
- Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanders… Beck, Stefan
- Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanders… peter van der Stok
- Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanders… Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)
- Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanders… Rupak Chandra (ruchandr)
- Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanders… Esko Dijk
- Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanders… Brian Weis (bew)
- Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanders… Göran Selander
- Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanders… Hannes Tschofenig