Re: [Ace] AIF as a suggestion in key-groupcomm; AIF in MQTT
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 18 May 2020 16:12 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2561F3A082A for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2020 09:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZtaEuvD1gvrI for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2020 09:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 728E53A083B for <ace@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2020 09:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.119] (p548dc699.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.198.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49QkYW01kXzybZ; Mon, 18 May 2020 18:12:14 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <C6776FE8-B71C-4739-90EC-928D9D39604D@tzi.org>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 18:12:14 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 611511133.987774-3b8484438d8a6f736a9d018ff44f302e
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6E0205F6-250C-433C-A09F-C0F2E0E44D00@tzi.org>
References: <C6776FE8-B71C-4739-90EC-928D9D39604D@tzi.org>
To: Ace Wg <ace@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/ciH78ClRjmSzetbymhGyS-bg8zU>
Subject: Re: [Ace] AIF as a suggestion in key-groupcomm; AIF in MQTT
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 16:12:19 -0000
On 2020-05-18, at 17:21, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote: > > [1]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bormann-core-ace-aif Benjamin reminds me that this has -core- as the crucial third word of the draft name. I hope that doesn’t get in the way if we decide to pick this up as an (informational) ACE document (I could resubmit this under a different name, but that would be confusing). Or we (ACE) could actually decide to throw this back over the fence to CoRE? Grüße, Carsten
- [Ace] AIF as a suggestion in key-groupcomm; AIF i… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Ace] AIF as a suggestion in key-groupcomm; A… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Ace] AIF as a suggestion in key-groupcomm; A… Jim Schaad