IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ace] adopting documents

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 23 July 2014 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094C71A00BE for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 08:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_NO_TEXT=2, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_TVD_MIME_NO_HEADERS=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ytSniNp8eWfu for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 08:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A13B1A0058 for <ace@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 08:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADDA20012 for <ace@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:40:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 9CA9663B0E; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:38:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85CC363B0A for <ace@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:38:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: ace <ace@ietf.org>
X-Attribution: mcr
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:38:51 -0400
Message-ID: <15740.1406129931@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/gOavlTc2YH_j8VZ_odBdw6er3BY
Subject: [Ace] adopting documents
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:38:53 -0000

I have read the following documents:
  draft-gerdes-ace-actors-01    -
  draft-seitz-ace-usecases-01
  draft-seitz-ace-design-considerations-00
  draft-seitz-ace-problem-description-01

I would like to suggest immediate adoption of:
  draft-gerdes-ace-actors-01    -
  draft-seitz-ace-usecases-01   -

(I realize that there is no call for adoption on these as yet).
My feeling is that ace-actors is essentially a really useful terminology
document which are leveraged usefully elsewhere, and I'd like to see it
published as quickly as possible.

If we need to revise draft-seitz-ace-problem-description-01 okay, but we
could adopt it sooner too.

I'm not sure if draft-seitz-ace-design-considerations-00 is for
more than just discussion, so I have no opinion about it.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email