IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ace] AD Review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 16 February 2018 21:17 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D09D126BF0 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:17:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0fj0HA5VW_uX for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:17:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x235.google.com (mail-pg0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CCBC124207 for <ace@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:17:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x235.google.com with SMTP id e11so3358002pgq.12 for <ace@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:17:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zOvjwbfxK/rZymrjgJefgJL+hcsCwK2Z3Qt3tX6IV1E=; b=S73anPrW8OabWDd9nHNNTqLa3M6vYW0zaEW98kIqHj7R+r2Qiesql//Jp/4kokLjsv 1tTlxv2idKgucUlUGH8a+sjoz1IfI7MLo9fC+JdYjXp/sR8w5r+NWc3TBLBJZKCSFBAW Fthj8AWCUnE453gjmEDziB7dp1cRJnb4B72T7cofUGoM0I7PvQXNzcsTeMeN/KNVBBP2 Q+DwLf2LSV6t8zIj/lC8oGlkug9+38xqozxAkFGAYM9f88s4vHKKWThHfv19cxTTiuyK PlzWxMcQwJ+YWBFdTgmOnVjM3kt4ehMsNQyxDnSzRAW4apl+8Wis5Kjeq1ljKWrces/r DJyg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zOvjwbfxK/rZymrjgJefgJL+hcsCwK2Z3Qt3tX6IV1E=; b=Ko8Jp9OWBc7vq70ALxW+XRCmDCMhvefpduXfqYlqsN09fXfxLxtdzSEqCNFKrWlRM7 j5UDHdiGZCZpu2OI4oz3Q5NkyKmnL0jyZJb2h35lKNpEbFJ3dztrlEqnQNaPgOle6wkN 90BuUE7VTj7C/+36Jwt276TgYvvEpWU2id57Bk3y9ffAULolMRonyIG8ftVLGQNUO3wh a2dw6DPL3FduEA/Wf34DS7hD6tNp++EiCWAlYb0oXojbs88C4ua60RJ8VWY+uOBqLQlh LkocIwwh3GwhNtgwNrT/PZEnwOF7QUspyStxsB8WnunGDHNXxWmxXN7C2hIQN+r/jWkq KgCA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPB2x3vggfUmRq4g1c/mNFprOqpksiglm3JeiOU9EBZMTv3gqYem mqxOInGfSF0mPueS075xdtsZkBQ8oaQhsN5NbUY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2265CP6J0F3LUGwMmwzya8+tuIGgZZSNVT3iBDugVK+OpEIhGJ9Nvh3UxKKYFo8y6ucx+EBiM7lIkTOECZZZrNA=
X-Received: by 10.98.94.71 with SMTP id s68mr7273107pfb.135.1518815850806; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:17:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.229.67 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:16:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR2101MB094398521A54A7DD9451B033F5CB0@SN6PR2101MB0943.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAHbuEH48LmfCYKhd3C8+qTO+JTPb9tddqBYD=Ct07OAdAwOJ4w@mail.gmail.com> <SN6PR2101MB094398521A54A7DD9451B033F5CB0@SN6PR2101MB0943.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 16:16:50 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH6GzriGwHLHqn6H=Sec3BGOW+t5b4VndvfLAE4uS5qW4w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
Cc: "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/hHQ2PnvUUOrBOlrp-uQV-KtgPkU>
Subject: Re: [Ace] AD Review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 21:17:33 -0000

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote:
> This information is in the registration template at https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12#section-9.1.1, as follows:
>

OK, could you clarify that in the IANA section with a simple pointer
to the registration template?

This update can come with any other IETF last call comments.

Thank you!
Kathleen

>    Claim Key:
>       CBOR map key for the claim.  Integer values between -256 and 255
>       and strings of length 1 are designated as Standards Track
>       Required.  Integer values from -65536 to 65535 and strings of
>       length 2 are designated as Specification Required.  Integer values
>       of greater than 65535 and strings of length greater than 2 are
>       designated as Expert Review.  Integer values less than -65536 are
>       marked as Private Use.
>
>                                 Thanks again,
>                                 -- Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ace <ace-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Kathleen Moriarty
> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2018 12:42 PM
> To: ace@ietf.org
> Subject: [Ace] AD Review of draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12
>
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for your work on draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12
>
> The draft looks good and I'll kick off IETF last call today, but have an important question that may require clarification in the draft.
>
> In the IANA section 9.1, how does one know which document type is needed?  Could you add text about how one might differentiate the values to drive that decision?
>
>    Depending upon the values being requested, registration requests are
>    evaluated on a Standards Track Required, Specification Required,
>    Expert Review, or Private Use basis [RFC8126] after a three-week
>    review period on the cwt-reg-review@ietf.org mailing list, on the
>    advice of one or more Designated Experts.
>
>
> --
>
> Best regards,
> Kathleen
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ace mailing list
> Ace@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email