Re: [Ace] FW: [IANA #1157486] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-27.txt> (Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments (ACE) using the OAuth 2.0 Framework (ACE-OAuth)) to Proposed Standard
Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Tue, 24 December 2019 20:15 UTC
Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDA21200F4 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 12:15:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cAOmupLgNCMz for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 12:15:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 354901200B6 for <ace@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 12:15:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id xBOKFBGG005544 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 24 Dec 2019 15:15:13 -0500
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 12:15:10 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
Cc: 'Ludwig Seitz' <ludwig_seitz@gmx.de>, 'Daniel Migault' <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>, 'Roman Danyliw' <rdd@cert.org>, ace@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20191224201510.GV35479@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <RT-Ticket-1157486@icann.org> <157508633572.4770.7120325133415529789.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <rt-4.4.3-30491-1576273382-1996.1157486-37-0@icann.org> <000901d5b201$0ff47c90$2fdd75b0$@augustcellars.com> <42f75b3b-9d85-5483-401b-d23b167dd038@gmx.de> <008301d5b831$e91ba8f0$bb52fad0$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <008301d5b831$e91ba8f0$bb52fad0$@augustcellars.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/hgUYKChS1mTTQ7EWUEtanbt2Zmc>
Subject: Re: [Ace] FW: [IANA #1157486] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-27.txt> (Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments (ACE) using the OAuth 2.0 Framework (ACE-OAuth)) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 20:15:31 -0000
On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 11:07:34AM -0800, Jim Schaad wrote: > Personal opinion, > > I think that we should be requesting a separate page. I think we are going to have enough different registries that keeping them separate from OAuth is going to be useful in preventing confusion. For the mapping registries, it might be useful to see if IANA can give us a link from the mapping registry to the OAuth registry. I think IANA can do that sort of link, and am inclined to agree about having a separate page. -Ben
- [Ace] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-27.t… The IESG
- Re: [Ace] FW: [IANA #1157486] Last Call: <draft-i… Ludwig Seitz
- Re: [Ace] FW: [IANA #1157486] Last Call: <draft-i… Jim Schaad
- Re: [Ace] FW: [IANA #1157486] Last Call: <draft-i… Benjamin Kaduk