Re: [Ace] on signature verification times for sec192r1
Pascal Urien <pascal.urien@gmail.com> Mon, 25 July 2016 10:28 UTC
Return-Path: <pascal.urien@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4F212D793 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 03:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3jY5C2FVI1ve for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 03:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22c.google.com (mail-oi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 960B212D0E5 for <ace@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 03:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id l72so245884632oig.2 for <ace@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 03:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uo8KtgaSoipB9uk98K/aZ0ewtz81XNKlGDqgoOWnBcc=; b=W1BbK7aZXjvUWgp/0ni7ntkkXpzDeBvis2mBYwKZ+hllnjRzBazbqQ7Tva5457zGP8 A68YFi9+JSaqF0w5S/V/b58AseejoYXjj2ByJYJd/rN9z6s+OyCxueS5oWfavArP8oT8 PSDXBrLwa1eKsr1/zKVVlcIeeLt6kydWBXpUQzeR1NhYdqY1LxNB0j6mA9CVW0iIB2fJ pAr3qhSrom1BIIy08gAfsKcit05tO5MGH4o2nB6dcGJL2b3SH/1ElHhKrPr3y1RJazOK LGExCn3kbkoXbb1c93Q2XDrmYZhvgHDml9w90KQbTJa1G+feG7Hqd1FbIrhuVWLL33I8 DOwQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uo8KtgaSoipB9uk98K/aZ0ewtz81XNKlGDqgoOWnBcc=; b=CEqx+xx+4aI3ApuV7JKB1n1Ot0OeOFG7xGfVYaBfWnHJoHfEsexhtI+KWp7lxMnvXQ muMJbFLdFKPg8ES+7YEujfp9Ytwa7toxliFPaEPBVaI+JlTWEHw/0ybhwpzna+wCJ67i qnoTOqpaAKj7VVyfJaU+6GXAawIsWPUqyEYymlo+TuXkQafHsX6NrPoWzBHLoaBfzZgs 3WgN5hvelB0Q8dfL4uB2H40+eXnipiOS/E3sV/KDb+INwAWaz5P0SPsPBzVOwl/lNDlS jsQtbeXoHjVgopHBPK/6hti2NPHzrJtokfjCbMCswRvsEJwZBsoEaQMCERGo6vvBShW7 5nuA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuk/t2/JACS4tj+2QhVoPMzfaeFvkIk3VRt4OPAovk1T+1ezWI0UAugUnOFngxgZYpFJERaCAlofqifWw==
X-Received: by 10.202.212.205 with SMTP id l196mr9574098oig.175.1469442516849; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 03:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.179.85 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 03:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0601MB220388A00B3F75D2A755002AFC0D0@HE1PR0601MB2203.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAEQGKXRxLKGROW9MdJEzkXsS9f4NVFqqh12c+t4qaK5bDYhuaw@mail.gmail.com> <d107de0f-2134-5b80-c9e2-ddb5e5e79788@comcast.net> <CAEQGKXQgp4AzCJFuBqezhZ0SmHG3QdgmH353LWisx-5WGmifpA@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR0601MB220388A00B3F75D2A755002AFC0D0@HE1PR0601MB2203.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
From: Pascal Urien <pascal.urien@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 12:28:36 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEQGKXSSbyb+58FPpFFkJCD2Vix-icHpO9vXSbpPWJYpL5CyLA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Somaraju Abhinav <abhinav.somaraju@tridonic.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d3c6a3c196c0538733f17"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/htj0WmPPqsLCAQGjhQG0odGLhVc>
Cc: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>, "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ace] on signature verification times for sec192r1
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:28:39 -0000
Hi Abhinav The extra time (2ms/bloc) comes from the hash procedure (sha1 in the example) that works with 64 bytes blocs Rgs Pascal 2016-07-25 12:04 GMT+02:00 Somaraju Abhinav <abhinav.somaraju@tridonic.com>: > Hi Pascal, > > > > Thanks for the information. Could you please explain what is > nb_bloc_512bits? > > > > Regards, > > Abhinav > > > > *From:* Ace [mailto:ace-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Pascal Urien > *Sent:* Sonntag, 24. Juli 2016 11:51 > *To:* Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net> > *Cc:* ace@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [Ace] on signature verification times for sec192r1 > > > > I fully agree... > > > > J3A081M can be found at 10$ over the WEB > > > > Futhermore this class of cheap device can process TLS or DTLS as > illustrated in > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-urien-uta-tls-dtls-security-module-00 > > > > They could be used for numerous applications in the IoT > > > > Rgs > > > > Pascal > > > > > > 2016-07-23 23:59 GMT+02:00 Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>: > > On 7/23/2016 11:10 AM, Pascal Urien wrote: > > Hi All > > > > J3A081M is a javacard device from NXP > > > > The micocontroller should be the P5CD081V1A, which comprises a crypto > processor > > > There's a number of these from a number of vendors. I'd actually look at > the A7xxx series of chips as they're designed to be embeddable. I've > become a big fan of javacard style solutions over the years. > > In any event, the number of relatively inexpensive public key crypto > accelerator chips (e.g. googl for "secure authentication chips") is greater > than zero and continues to climb. And for not a lot of money. Estimating > what from prices on Digikey, I'd think something less than $.50 for > Quantity large as of today and half that or less in 1-2 years as its gets > bundled into the "Swiss Army Knife" style of process (e.g. support for > wireless 900mhz plus ... plus ... plus ... plus security...) (google for > iot module secure element 900mhz for example). > > Later, Mike > > > > > > > The performances with the curve secp192r1 are the following (for ECDSA + > SHA1) > > > > Sign = 40ms + nb_bloc_512bits x 3.5 ms > > Verify = 60ms + nb_bloc_512bits x 3,5 ms > > > > > > By the way this chip has enough crypto ressouces for processing TLS or DTLS > > > > Rgs > > > > Pascal > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ace mailing list > > Ace@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ace mailing list > Ace@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace > > > ________________________________________________________ The contents of > this e-mail and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient. > They may not be disclosed to or used by or copied in any way by anyone > other than the intended recipient. If this e-mail is received in error, > please immediately notify the sender and delete the e-mail and attached > documents. Please note that neither the sender nor the sender's company > accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan > or otherwise check this e-mail and any attachments. >
- Re: [Ace] on signature verification times for sec… Pascal Urien
- Re: [Ace] on signature verification times for sec… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Ace] on signature verification times for sec… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Ace] on signature verification times for sec… Somaraju Abhinav
- Re: [Ace] on signature verification times for sec… Pascal Urien
- Re: [Ace] on signature verification times for sec… Somaraju Abhinav
- Re: [Ace] on signature verification times for sec… Pascal Urien
- Re: [Ace] on signature verification times for sec… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ace] on signature verification times for sec… Pascal Urien
- [Ace] on signature verification times for sec192r1 Pascal Urien
- Re: [Ace] on signature verification times for sec… Pascal Urien