[Ace] Warren Kumari's No Record on draft-ietf-ace-extend-dtls-authorize-06: (with COMMENT)

[Warren Kumari via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ace-extend-dtls-authorize-06: No Record

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-extend-dtls-authorize/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks to Yingzhen Qu for the helpful OpsDir review:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-ace-extend-dtls-authorize-06-opsdir-lc-qu-2023-02-09/

I encourage the authors to review this, and respond to the "In case both the
client and server support both TLS and DTLS, it says here “It is up to the
implementation to handle”. However it also says “the client typically first
tries using DTLS”, this seems to give priority to DTLS. Please clarify."