[Ace] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-17: (with DISCUSS)

[Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-17: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-coap-est/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 5.6:

The EST-coaps client MUST support
   Block1 only if it sends EST-coaps requests with an IP packet size
   that exceeds the Path MTU.

I think the requirement for when Block1 is required to be supported in the
above sentence is unclear. Is the intention to say: An EST-coaps MUST support
block1 to be capable to send requests that would otherwise result in the
reliance on IP level fragmentation?