Re: [Acme] Adoption of draft-sipos-acme-dtnnodeid

[Russ Housley <[e-mail]>]

I read it and posted comments.  I think we should adopt the document as a starting point.

Russ


> On Aug 13, 2020, at 11:27 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz=[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> At IETF 108, we discussed https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sipos-acme-dtnnodeid/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sipos-acme-dtnnodeid/>  The minutes of that discussion are below (thanks again Yaron)
>  
> Should we adopt this document?  At the meeting there was mild interest to do so.
> Please reply by end of next week.
>  
>  
> Brian Sipos on DTN (delay-tolerant networking) Draft
>  
> Roman: are DTN nodes on the public Internet? Or closed network?
> Brian: no need for ACME if on a closed network. CA probably integrated in DTN.
> Sites have gateway nodes into the open Internet. Connecting to a public (not
> necessarily commercial) CA. Rick (DTN chair): are you offering to publish in
> ACME as an Experimental doc, or keep it within DTN? Brian: intend to keep in
> DTN. Use of URI validation is new to ACME. Rick: ACME is possibly a good way to
> resolve existing IESG discusses. Can take it off-line. Roman: would ACME
> servers have understanding of DTN identifiers? Brian: they would need to be DTN
> nodes. Just like the ACME server that implements the SMTP validation draft. Use
> case is inter-site DTN. Node is accepting bundles from other domains, lower
> trust exists. Yoav: ACME servers are CAs. They are reluctant to provide service
> to anything other than the normal web use case. Brian: no expectation of uptake
> in generic ACME servers. Rich: precedent for non-web use cases [missed
> specifics]. Rick: DTN is a small focused WG, not sure they have the bandwidth
> to take it on. Would be happy if ACME does. Brian: and this is so similar to
> SMTP. YN: hum? Roman: ask re: familiarity. YN: we know the answer. Hum: have
> you read it? pianissimo. YN: will not ask on adoption. Alexey: ask who is
> willing to review. Chat: Melinda, Russ, Rich, Alexey, Yoav. YN: let's read,
> then maybe have a call for adoption.
>