[Acme] Looking for comments on https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/issues/215
"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Sat, 03 December 2016 02:18 UTC
Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1B7129507 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 18:18:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.596
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7LoqMEqb3rMh for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 18:18:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com [96.6.114.98]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F999129504 for <acme@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 18:18:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE05D496C15 for <acme@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Dec 2016 02:18:51 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay09.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay09.akamai.com [172.27.22.68]) by prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE42E496C84 for <acme@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Dec 2016 02:18:51 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1480731531; bh=vFD7Vb4HFOxGdPeWZ11s5gkDjYrKOKfVKoY3Qhx6Ofg=; l=3282; h=From:To:Date:From; b=EQe7mOGJa1PItnmHp73Y6CQwqNDTJyHINqyUDLDho6MibCuy2dEUmkq9441po+BTP fBCORDjyXxuLm3suoutNz31YGgzT77mT2IVZngsX4UgG7qlri0SfrdXpk0WPg1VMLM 2fmwvOkJxjvpLGBgfRGPObfzIrywyjZdS5MtNP/w=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cas1.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.30]) by prod-mail-relay09.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58E61E07C for <acme@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Dec 2016 02:18:51 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 21:18:50 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 21:18:51 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Looking for comments on https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/issues/215
Thread-Index: AdJNCmKLxhD/DBn9RW+cYFHYCqyWhA==
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 02:18:51 +0000
Message-ID: <0af93d402273472f9b54603f6aa73e5f@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.32.77]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0af93d402273472f9b54603f6aa73e5fusma1exdag1mb1msgcorpak_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/3-CAWUka7RDyb6uLBVH0e0ZoJNs>
Subject: [Acme] Looking for comments on https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/issues/215
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 02:18:54 -0000
With the couple of recent pull requests, the document editors are about to close all but on issue, #215. Does the WG have any feelings on this? Is it something we need to address NOW, or can we add a new type of challenge later on if there's interest? Please reply on-list by earl next week. -- Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies Member, OpenSSL Dev Team IM: richsalz@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz
- [Acme] Looking for comments on https://github.com… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Acme] Looking for comments on https://github… Patrick Figel
- Re: [Acme] Looking for comments on https://github… Philipp Junghannß
- Re: [Acme] Looking for comments on https://github… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Acme] Looking for comments on https://github… Daniel McCarney