Re: [Acme] 2nd working group call for adoption
Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Fri, 15 October 2021 14:46 UTC
Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C063A08FD for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 07:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QMM6m2UpNJVZ for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 07:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82e.google.com (mail-qt1-x82e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D82C3A08FA for <acme@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 07:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82e.google.com with SMTP id r17so8964241qtx.10 for <acme@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 07:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qw88rjYxEpMtJHcIKTe06C0In9gt6jI8YJNscuaOktc=; b=2NaNd4k/6hbDdge5DU8rFi7ASpu585nCdMyCQucwJnNWCXphHGGp6nOIq/vytWXM/T 766AxeccgflS2y5WUEYL/5mH4haw2ZYi/Tp8V2Up7oKhTS76uaWSofgQC3CM2teP3PGH WQam0k4xTDlaOVH2P25CaUQ2lLTvW8ATs53hS2SdG1EseN+0Fi1rQYEo5HU8SGNX4FAB dG9sc5wh20r28oKsgmVcXlkrmAiMa84vDE9pyIiD4D4pHZFlIIY1tIz664d41K75Xkab p0hq70eTSHU40veBsT0sCu+xkm6DWSaxXrKZZL8j6+XhsPUdIhInih1VyYG8YCSDPKB8 +8Lg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qw88rjYxEpMtJHcIKTe06C0In9gt6jI8YJNscuaOktc=; b=NHnMLGM2hZYAqKwjdxpbP/IljGcXiyWkNfViKmYuaHbLDpNeqEohvPE8bKDgRxDfmY BBg9pb8HsEqoHIAkR6WDMjOVg3S3l/Nsz16D5u3qQMnZcQzEczdOP8ejxq6rxAUy4PO8 WLMWOTXdesk1sWfwC98bnPgJ3D9az1/Tt6fXaMbHjslR4xEaIjgsK3E2y3QLIpsVQ4ei PK7POgJcKmYDCEGjVxu7uDXK/pHJ3rWH0sR4kf81fmXzACFzhtlYsr7iy6YyqoH+izf7 l4We8GQG47Nx/47dydtQVI0ImNVtt7RNnUQxqtjzMoHoF8eVlCpqsZtIiGFTK7b/XEfT k3Mw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530evSazBNDNBW9SFOATiyCrfXK/YPNZABK2Un4XoUVbARm5G+9s sY3S5gj36+MEsvEkHuxuxq7HPq02kPye7NN2QPy2LLXmadU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxE0sVkXR3bAnrcBwF/KdctIRa9/C9z3qRP5yn4cuBMBkXQpNitQmL1PgGDusjEjybwsjyyh+FFc9Yv3woiMwU=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7143:: with SMTP id h3mr13967378qtp.242.1634309197138; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 07:46:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <35b4f7e6b91a4d8fab408cb53a6381cf@nsa.gov>
In-Reply-To: <35b4f7e6b91a4d8fab408cb53a6381cf@nsa.gov>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:46:26 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgTCUw8gVZXbqa6aeaHH3WWNPLGF7BoHwFveda8+h4MioA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Cooley, Dorothy E" <decoole=40nsa.gov@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000261d0605ce654347"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/97dZTCWhZDrCfGr_EpRBmwiydzM>
Subject: Re: [Acme] 2nd working group call for adoption
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 14:46:44 -0000
I have read the document, and support its adoption. This functionality actually reflects the existing behavior of a lot of CAs in the Web PKI (allowing issuance for subdomains after validating a registered domain), so it's good to have clear semantics in ACME for it. --Richard On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 8:17 AM Cooley, Dorothy E <decoole= 40nsa.gov@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > This is the second working group call for adoption of: > draft-friel-acme-subdomains-05. > We have had presentations of this work at the most recent interim > (clarifications presented) and at many of the past IETF meetings. > > Please review the draft and post your comments to the list by Thursday, 28 > October 2021. > > Thanks, > Deb and Yoav > > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > Acme@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >
- [Acme] 2nd working group call for adoption Cooley, Dorothy E
- Re: [Acme] 2nd working group call for adoption Salz, Rich
- Re: [Acme] 2nd working group call for adoption Russ Housley
- Re: [Acme] 2nd working group call for adoption Martin Thomson
- Re: [Acme] 2nd working group call for adoption Owen Friel (ofriel)
- Re: [Acme] 2nd working group call for adoption Richard Barnes
- Re: [Acme] 2nd working group call for adoption Seo Suchan
- Re: [Acme] 2nd working group call for adoption Kampanakis, Panos
- Re: [Acme] 2nd working group call for adoption dr… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Acme] 2nd working group call for adoption Martin Thomson
- Re: [Acme] 2nd working group call for adoption Eliot Lear
- Re: [Acme] 2nd working group call for adoption Owen Friel (ofriel)