Re: [Acme] Explicitly forbid to answer GET requests for account info
Daniel McCarney <cpu@letsencrypt.org> Mon, 05 March 2018 14:30 UTC
Return-Path: <dmccarney@letsencrypt.org>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3696312D82F for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 06:30:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=letsencrypt.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NpffYisXRy_R for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 06:30:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x22f.google.com (mail-io0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4FE712D777 for <acme@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 06:30:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id v6so18164414iog.7 for <acme@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Mar 2018 06:30:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=letsencrypt.org; s=google; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=BO1AZMPVG8/bbNpO5lL3f06Z9tL0O00VexVBY3vJHdg=; b=N3hUCS2aURTcJBXT8R4MPB175Ks/jifgvqQJp5BDgexca/gtth42FlMZqdQ+7l0lWG ikXpR7skaMFBtMmV+kfIjtjIZDta6Eta3u3zbZhO+sJvTVq8ICDn6vQD2OKRx+UL5/oj Uoc+K080Vl2Bn+fBDpfQZMn+ptzjnBl80iRfo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BO1AZMPVG8/bbNpO5lL3f06Z9tL0O00VexVBY3vJHdg=; b=dL5euvKMguCQKb9S7FGVQEf05BQwtTgEwp51W0jv8kEatxA/0la5LWGNq/FbAwl5Wq o5mMFiSKiXcyijb1H79VyzEOh+geYu5RrEa9dbwkfI9QsBoqZUz6Z988+SD4dgpg7sxi CINo43rFXg6o7leenHXyszDhAGcThZEBXE+nOb+4prRS5++cbje+CHqcQK+pf0hc9TdW IOK9L/IDOx4INwIBBS65zOeUPG0YFV517UOAsoTUXlBt7l+Q/glZ7cQwmm8VhHmZqNZ4 keoTrfLOGOCXq7Dx+O3ChHidsOwAP3t84FohFBDz/ezOZ9KtM5yYRhH0yY3NDYw3j4hb zmpQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7FmjrHlftBhbglkA8mMjg+fX3WaYQpO3yTr+0JJXwquwuL1yudl k4vZAEuGxXIW1v0jp9i1zEPR2VoQidZ/a38tke9j/g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsgTIxl5l6qDvnLPRN0ueXJCyHHzBp0emYrXvjIYg+ZHJqyniVQoa6DESb7eZDNTvnw1AmSMJg3Qc2h9C0XsGg=
X-Received: by 10.107.185.86 with SMTP id j83mr17774542iof.305.1520260249465; Mon, 05 Mar 2018 06:30:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: cpu@letsencrypt.org
Received: by 10.107.21.2 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 06:30:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20180304115704.GG2161@carrot.tutnicht.de>
References: <20180304115704.GG2161@carrot.tutnicht.de>
From: Daniel McCarney <cpu@letsencrypt.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 09:30:48 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKnbcLhD2G24ak-0eji8EBXyD2jCJFyfz7N0uyf_ckf0EEM_xg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jörn Heissler <acme-specs@joern.heissler.de>
Cc: IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c06d36a22ce1d0566ab2c90"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/BtsmYqS8keITAFdZwBgR_PGFUcE>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Explicitly forbid to answer GET requests for account info
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 14:30:57 -0000
Thanks Joern, merged. On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Jörn Heissler <acme-specs@joern.heissler.de> wrote: > Hi, > > another PR that slightly changes meaning (SHOULD NOT -> MUST NOT): > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/407 > > Section "Request Authentication" says: > "Servers MUST NOT respond to GET requests for resources that might be > considered sensitive. Account resources are the only sensitive resources > defined in this specification." > > I agree with the "MUST NOT" here as account contains e.g. my contact data. > Therefore section "Account Information" should also says "MUST NOT": > "Servers MUST NOT respond to GET requests for account resources..." > > Cheers > Joern Heissler > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > Acme@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme > >
- [Acme] Explicitly forbid to answer GET requests f… Jörn Heissler
- Re: [Acme] Explicitly forbid to answer GET reques… Daniel McCarney