[Acme] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-ari-07
Aaron Gable <aaron@letsencrypt.org> Wed, 11 December 2024 01:01 UTC
Return-Path: <aaron@letsencrypt.org>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44542C1D6FCA for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 17:01:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=letsencrypt.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eV6Ke1NX66Aq for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 17:01:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x232.google.com (mail-oi1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE8C0C1D6FB5 for <acme@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 17:01:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x232.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3eb5a870158so1115652b6e.3 for <acme@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 17:01:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=letsencrypt.org; s=google; t=1733878866; x=1734483666; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=iCxE5hnIp6ZpflVeZ6pUoouP0BaYcZCtHq/htgCkiJk=; b=YqxW7UvrL4pP75g91tlMhAlkJ8nFA/QGAgZSiArNm/0E3ZOFGKyN+PeYBjztuNWpfW z1U7r24Xba1QCH/3PcQSuZfxbvFAjWPyi41lk7kMZjWxv3IBkTQ+Kc19Zdi+m22ZeWYe rmNluEKcFX0/rr62RZRa140Vf9JNEI5AinHYY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1733878866; x=1734483666; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=iCxE5hnIp6ZpflVeZ6pUoouP0BaYcZCtHq/htgCkiJk=; b=QN4vKDlmQ1J9aZgjlCp9iRtIGA9cU4r7aVyu1f/Yw++oU2oiifycOHE1bGVYMM5Omy V+xIz7PaeObVu2yXQyjh66iyL1tbbX/O6PuIiQWKEoDuns8WcHEzcKPlrj/wch/nDwzJ tbKUgTlI2doXINhEPr0KZhG7xkhN1Cju6mlfWS8qvvqjGOigY/k1MHgg7ES50qvAimg8 Gh8oxLgmscSqzsa2aFv5cZEy+rQkFun2z1hn5uCN77HUKzrltXBnEINbk60CRprd2PeW r5woe5uxvJscMf7qEkiWg86ZuHsxy++X4ejRCxLB+zHXUbmLw/kdxzAdwW3ahuaVudyz YCjw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVzL6osexlTf2ebYbEo02FbzJ/iD0Xtk439DfLjfboR7QBbCmL1T7B3ORwjBYJOinEpYnOW@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxY9SNgcq30G4DMtXIps6rJVcrEw1QIi/xHhEefH+5mKzvTH1Na mG4j9uYAbcAMBMS8oQtc8Ojv0TJYuveS1nC0Yd6YlTVKEZcBWTGBdXpsPOeq0bXRr+JuuCbkm6n Oa+k028nRanf7qTHX8TTJ8WltXtUsWrVWM5bW5g==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvOHf6a6b3DOBnmZnJXI2pqzTWfwfPiNIdno13WxAxnMpTjGt7BS+gx4GMS2d8 k2+3q4C5956+0JtTi5BqGwtJeWEClmyJOdCGj
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHRRmC5nFk4VPI7TeY+94odNTtj9UMvVJgm9nSPo0fujyLmK7BEBXnKHyxtAhlWtNn00LJFMwEu7MbfhS6eDFU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:8e17:b0:29e:5dfd:1e17 with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-2a012c5cb8bmr767919fac.23.1733878865966; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 17:01:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <173369199776.421432.17607968515495593719@dt-datatracker-6747d7fbdb-jqfx6>
In-Reply-To: <173369199776.421432.17607968515495593719@dt-datatracker-6747d7fbdb-jqfx6>
From: Aaron Gable <aaron@letsencrypt.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 17:00:55 -0800
Message-ID: <CAEmnErdck9H4DvXL6G6bXzZWp8Z5Ym72KQ0Ps-MUhMDQv_GHEw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e3ccb50628f421e2"
Message-ID-Hash: DXG53YN2ST4M4OCOKKR55OTISCCUXHCZ
X-Message-ID-Hash: DXG53YN2ST4M4OCOKKR55OTISCCUXHCZ
X-MailFrom: aaron@letsencrypt.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-acme.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: gen-art@ietf.org, acme@ietf.org, draft-ietf-acme-ari.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Acme] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-ari-07
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/EYRIbQNcEmpeVS6AFlQZ9LE0oNU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:acme-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:acme-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:acme-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Susan, Thank you for the feedback. I've addressed these changes in the github working copy in https://github.com/aarongable/draft-acme-ari/pull/89, which will be included in the next version of the document. Individual comments inline below. Thanks again, Aaron On Sun, Dec 8, 2024 at 1:06 PM Susan Hares via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > Minor Issues: > 1) What happens in the case of a large clock skew between the ACME Client > and servers, and > This topic was included in the Security Considerations section as a result of the DNSDIR review <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-acme-ari-06-dnsdir-lc-huston-2024-11-23/>. I believe I have largely addressed their feedback. > 2) Use of unauthenticated GET Requests. This topic was included in the Security Considerations section as a result of the SECDIR review of draft -06 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-acme-ari-06-secdir-lc-emery-2024-11-26/>. That reviewer has indicated that draft -07 satisfies their concerns <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/taSJ9dPguM0lxTe3NeR-Aj9EDSM/>. > Nits/editorial comments: > 1. Introduction, Paragraph 1, Use of ";", problem: Unclear sentence. > reason: Grammar > Old text:/ They may be configured to renew at > a specific interval (e.g., via cron); they may parse the issued > certificate to determine its expiration date and renew a specific > amount of time before then; or they may parse the issued certificate > and renew when some percentage of its validity period has passed./ > > What's wrong: The grammar usage for semi-color is that the phrases > separated by the ";" are equal restatements of the same information. > A different form of the list would be a clearer statement. I've switched this sentence to use commas instead of semicolons. I believe the semicolons were holdovers from a prior version of this sentence that had more complex (comma-containing) structures within each list item. 2. Section 6, paragraph 2, 2nd sentence, Unclear sentence > > Text:/ For example, a server might place the suggested renewal > window wholly in the past to encourage a client to renew immediately; > but a client with a sufficiently slow clock might see the suggested > window as still being in the future./ > > Option1: > New text:/ For example, a server might place the suggested renewal > window wholly in the past to encourage a client to renew immediately. > However, a client with a sufficiently slow clock might see the suggested > window as being in the future./ > I've taken a slightly different approach to simplifying this sentence: "For example, if a server places the suggested renewal window wholly in the past to encourage a client to renew immediately, a client with a sufficiently slow clock might nonetheless see the window as being in the future."
- [Acme] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme… Susan Hares via Datatracker
- [Acme] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-… Aaron Gable
- [Acme] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-… Susan Hares