Re: [Acme] Example requests

Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org> Mon, 05 March 2018 22:23 UTC

Return-Path: <jsha@eff.org>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9AF112EA55 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 14:23:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eff.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N9mX6Wx-2d0Z for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 14:23:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.eff.org (mail2.eff.org [173.239.79.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3461812E87F for <acme@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 14:23:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eff.org; s=mail2; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version: Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=l2vA3rjnAxt87hq0gPpMvbwyKFoP0Z38YjFhgbKC+SM=; b=VoozqSC/T8Tok4Y+vwbkDYD6bE RA6dls+IL4fufIoJet2xhCBNKFKO5nZiKZ+mkXtg6Hdk1vtoWEiJLiH0xJDHA8JKiFxpAaY+cfp+q 4Ryo044rVt5aRvXIGGVRqoL+nSSb4u9fWJs/CMvTSxRKEXb5rrslIE7Sw/pGcPCUbZUk=;
Received: ; Mon, 05 Mar 2018 14:23:36 -0800
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, Jörn Heissler <acme-specs@joern.heissler.de>
Cc: ACME WG <acme@ietf.org>
References: <20180304213623.GJ2161@carrot.tutnicht.de> <CAL02cgSnmKHLUK-SM6tF7bOvkXfDdh5qmgQd+jf1Dcarz9_Z5w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
Message-ID: <f23bf41b-e498-0780-510d-1b60bf99297b@eff.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 14:23:36 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgSnmKHLUK-SM6tF7bOvkXfDdh5qmgQd+jf1Dcarz9_Z5w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/EdJlJmRFLV6PXyB9DhhxxBuNMHk>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Example requests
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 22:23:41 -0000

On 03/04/2018 02:17 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:

> Hey Joern,
>
> This is a probably a good thing to have.  I think that rather than
> putting these in the main spec, it might be better to have them in a
> second draft.  This is a pretty common pattern.  For example, for TLS
> 1.3, there's a "test vectors" document separate from the main spec
> [0].  There are a few documents with example "call flows" for SIP
> [1][2].  ACME is probably somewhere in the middle of those two cases.
I agree; the test vectors are a good idea, and should be part of another
document.