IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-acme-acme-14: (with COMMENT)

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 29 August 2018 16:55 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB25130E71; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.71
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.71 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XYphDXX6C10y; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:55:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01ADC130E63; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122332.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w7TGqjPL019372; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 17:55:12 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=hfY4KSqZfESSEdt2aIWfTP6VfoUlEEQe31FNJyZgZ/4=; b=CJF271oDpYeLqXqvrdmka2lvVZ+VXDsqsE0XhdaiboYIncg7yG6ADgsC4CddCV9t6UGt m5TigE58StAHvkvlGebx9M3L2CtFKgnHe8R/PRc84jEZudqrCH6WpbSdGxa4GeC57dnw rcuovqgLhrUEIraxwvzwSkls4cDC/h0yx/wNgLYj75xn89EA26at0y5KHVdDyGuhxNs9 6v9vfu3RDf1IGm0NNhqlzyia/V/VLAAfn7ojJ+et1PBYG1lhJPpc1CP/ykI9PkRMzdC7 iom9XCX5RWQWDQeLj8bMezz26cf3wEWK/oSMiWfOOJQswGsRhBgqc/ub/mKd1niBqab8 mg==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint4 (a96-6-114-87.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [96.6.114.87] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2m5ct5jqu5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 29 Aug 2018 17:55:12 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id w7TGnt5G004733; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 12:55:11 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.31]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2m32evctyw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 29 Aug 2018 12:55:11 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 12:55:10 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1365.000; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 12:55:10 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "cpu@letsencrypt.org" <cpu@letsencrypt.org>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
CC: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, "draft-ietf-acme-acme@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-acme-acme@ietf.org>, IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, "<acme-chairs@ietf.org>" <acme-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Acme] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-acme-acme-14: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHUP4l5Hkbc9Q6AaEahSbgEBKbOxKTXFteAgAAGcQCAAAtugP//yk2A
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:55:09 +0000
Message-ID: <5EDC099D-6070-4DC6-9561-C08BB1483041@akamai.com>
References: <153554127552.14913.5752261334380280625.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL02cgRZsexAbNhwb08ROxTSYLqpJEJv2D9-s-sdkZx6SumPOg@mail.gmail.com> <bcff02b8-7dc9-9606-1e73-2b1ba3bb76e1@isode.com> <CAKnbcLikPk7vxrJdRT1bAqbOkBy7kLwyA5ToFKYFJfiVNCS7xg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKnbcLikPk7vxrJdRT1bAqbOkBy7kLwyA5ToFKYFJfiVNCS7xg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.0.180812
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.33.190]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5EDC099D60704DC69561C08BB1483041akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-08-29_04:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1808290171
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-08-29_04:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1808290172
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/FU2ZZbx_nvYtUw0nBfeLM1dIGaA>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-acme-acme-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:55:20 -0000

I read the link you posted, thanks.

As long as we’re not breaking the HTTP spec, I agree that SHOULD seems to get the most interop.  As long as we’re getting signed reponses back, I don’t think it matters much where the redirect sends you.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email