[Acme] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-acme-caa-06: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-acme-caa-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-caa/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hugo, thank you for the work put into this document. Adding some examples was a
good idea.

I found it interesting that the security section represents roughly 50% of the
document ;-)

I have two comments and one nit. See below.

== COMMENTS ==

-- Section 2 --

Please use RFC 8174 boiler template for this section ;-)

-- Section 3 --

The word 'applicable' is used but never strictly defined. If defined in another
document, please add a reference (perhaps in the section 2), else please define
it.

== NIT ==

-- abstract --

Expand CAA, CA in the abstract ?