IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] "Status" field clarification

Logan Widick <logan.widick@gmail.com> Fri, 02 March 2018 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <logan.widick@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF42126D74 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 06:31:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XxJEhkBplyzj for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 06:31:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x230.google.com (mail-io0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D5ED120725 for <acme@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 06:31:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x230.google.com with SMTP id l12so10770677ioc.10 for <acme@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Mar 2018 06:31:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=G2TEc14FzwsufuvJiOKvlViGHWjt85w5aHq5+fsF4ow=; b=VhUo4TGhA8Jw9vQSuj1qVzkvekaOLiTfrL7hfzH40F6RkFO+pgfiZ099QA2NVfo7lv 3+8cKYCfquJe6Gazzxs/eo4u1T0IQaEzd/uEhnrAPHNAbBPNFAXLYHxiurvkkgJGUuvS /GFUBvpBrnFzmcfjPmX7MeA1pvWVEKP+XSUtms+7xYKAn1dvWWFeF1okeI8t4LbN3blO SqC6te16nR4zmgjrcPW0BqOpnEqz6WjONwUT6zhFDZmmvvO3F/+FKMNDeX0N/j/aKJq8 AOaGn1fQ7Bl8+4pPrCKnLrmhzL6dDO21K4eLBIEI2Omz0vIHL3F/xDboZ0hlRAA/mwSg co2A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=G2TEc14FzwsufuvJiOKvlViGHWjt85w5aHq5+fsF4ow=; b=Hsm9Y0puBob4UpsENbe3BkgifdqsPJMP3fh62diFBTwqf2JBQ47068JXAZkHL4ledZ Wg4j+kLPtFtKZO2kOWI9KgmcicJGQEb0F8yDcv0GgOSitE7A5DwqmmzIyYCzoCGwisnf EATItb7LbIHV2OdFS3cmy9Kr+av1XKfZJgaFOU6XLsJFqsa1t0NxPIJbWf0Ks8bfL4yq Xd8y9teqcLO+ooyNx+D2olVEAOpmNHjCwnctRtlSYGFb3gDyfhBg2R38E90f72MEQWL3 GEviRrhu3WMVfflUm4JC3EHih4+kBsesFbMlUfen5J9I2FcqINYp9O53LScWqlFRU1Jl 3lTg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7H2B9fVgCIF/fru7XZ2pjhrSbk107xubJYNDekRKgyt0zoF+qMV cCRCm+BDYpVDtQX+3EKLpraDrip/DmsW+TsvQyg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELuPNBgA6RV0nSMFTfZ+gq28wl6eprPC5sKX5aOMtutka0V5MLBUGtVFOZuujERzn5nigSWTTMCABl4105MUTOk=
X-Received: by 10.107.203.4 with SMTP id b4mr7105172iog.105.1520001061423; Fri, 02 Mar 2018 06:31:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.2.27.77 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 06:31:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.2.27.77 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 06:31:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgSFpJPqwBuNRXq_yaTKpdnO63uEHH38OGCqQrrO1LNL7Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL02cgSFpJPqwBuNRXq_yaTKpdnO63uEHH38OGCqQrrO1LNL7Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Logan Widick <logan.widick@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 08:31:00 -0600
Message-ID: <CAMmAzEKrqH=PWKACg5rvxm1jMhFkX75X1ROJiwsiQx5N0XK6+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Cc: ACME WG <acme@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1c5e0a53125405666ed328"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/N-RZXEmsgwmTWN8wU86SHxqdyOo>
Subject: Re: [Acme] "Status" field clarification
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 14:31:05 -0000

Are challenge retries still supported? If so, how will retries affect the
state transitions? What state would a server use to indicate that something
had an error but could be retried later?

Sincerely,

Logan Widick

On Mar 2, 2018 08:04, "Richard Barnes" <rlb@ipv.sx> wrote:

Hey all,

We had a couple of GitHub issues and mailing list posts expressing
confusion about the "status" field in ACME objects.  To try to clear all of
that up, I've posted a PR that lays out required state transitions and
aligns the field descriptions with that description.  All the description
should look very familiar.  The only innovation is to introduce a "ready"
state on orders, to give clients an easy way to know when to finalize.

https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/400

As you're probably aware the I-D deadline is Monday, so please send
comments ASAP.  If I don't hear anything back from this list, I'll confer
with my fellow editors and we'll make a unilateral decision for us to
discuss in London (and obviously roll back if needed).

Thanks,
--Richard

_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
Acme@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email