Re: [Acme] Call for adoption; (1) ACME challenge for ATIS/SIP (2) identifiers and challenges for telephone numbers
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 08 June 2017 19:43 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F95B127863 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tmUikPyiLPH1 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78F20126C2F for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66C73004CA for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:43:14 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id u5tHXNdmzODw for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:43:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from new-host-6.home (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35B4D3004B7; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:43:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <9162C522-19D1-4ED3-AA56-86CC14C5BE9D@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3AB8E021-82FD-4D55-97AC-5F974AF0CA20"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 15:43:12 -0400
In-Reply-To: <615c6cca39444b0db7a4e3c960576c40@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Cc: IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>
References: <615c6cca39444b0db7a4e3c960576c40@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/NmGa5O__KSeqUxyKvEjkAL91C60>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Call for adoption; (1) ACME challenge for ATIS/SIP (2) identifiers and challenges for telephone numbers
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 19:43:17 -0000
I think the ACME group should adopt both of these documents. Russ > On Jun 8, 2017, at 11:32 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote: > > At the interim we had strong consensus to adopt these two drafts as WG documents. I am grouping them in a single email because they are related, and to point out that with both of these we will be collaborating with the STIR WG. > > If you feel it is not appropriate for us to adopt, please post to the list by the end of next week: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-acme-service-provider-00 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-acme-service-provider-00> > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-peterson-acme-telephone-00 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-peterson-acme-telephone-00> > > -- > Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies > Member, OpenSSL Dev Team > IM: richsalz@jabber.at <mailto:richsalz@jabber.at> Twitter: RichSalz >