Re: [Acme] Benjamin Kaduk's Yes on draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn-06: (with COMMENT)

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 03 October 2019 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521E4120142; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 10:01:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ONy0-GSVuS4A; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 10:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CF6F12089D; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 10:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050102.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id x93GmnxT010140; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 18:01:06 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=9kFWM9cW5xMhLN/TZremCSWGRc54Axjx9p59Qmb37Ak=; b=KMlHO5x8kXhsOaqWUHEjpXmUB8LuRephkbQhbV7pswEUf7pBSMQsl4yQXKseu76gyKI3 o1su8smtS2XLnAROkPzpzB/H/08i5TyUMKcKHtOTmz3O3P9oUm3Z17YoqIgOgSf90jq3 JPPi78x0IgnjOOR6Tga09KwaWjDf5lRfgAwCZWkuudnG05bLGhwHcPE6ChYY3ne31F3T K5x26BxKiZn5QMkld1bezdCLMFm2s3BVWcGOkpp679/qPL49WyHEXqRGAWMS+X73w81w ve0g+SY6attl87AXRjZR9c13kRxcIvVwMY+N/jv84Ulb/rJJvKB4sypeYCiHQgHVsp9F sQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint3 (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [96.6.114.86] (may be forged)) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2v9vkfrneb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 03 Oct 2019 18:01:04 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x93Gn9R4031938; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 13:01:03 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.53]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2va2v0t7ep-3 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 03 Oct 2019 13:01:02 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 13:00:53 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 13:00:53 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "cpu@letsencrypt.org" <cpu@letsencrypt.org>, "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn@ietf.org>, "acme-chairs@ietf.org" <acme-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Acme] Benjamin Kaduk's Yes on draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn-06: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVd/SbzBSDDKhUZEa5GoTmpyGqw6dH55SAgAF+T4D//8JugA==
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 17:00:52 +0000
Message-ID: <1B539CC6-28C0-44FF-94E3-1FC6AA40C0A7@akamai.com>
References: <156989204879.24249.6112061930191061196.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <80c31b5c-7b56-8c79-2188-a0c90771f0b7@eff.org> <20191003164115.GU6424@kduck.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20191003164115.GU6424@kduck.mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1d.0.190908
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.33.88]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <8D3F4D19FC04A9469DDBB1A21F48D260@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-10-03_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=543 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910030146
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,1.0.8 definitions=2019-10-03_07:2019-10-03,2019-10-03 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=522 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1011 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1908290000 definitions=main-1910030146
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/W0LlemqcCM_Ok5BHfsFphauQxrI>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Benjamin Kaduk's Yes on draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 17:01:26 -0000

    > Roland, since we've gotten similar feedback twice, it seems worthwhile 
    > to update Appendix A to directly link Frans Rosen's excellent blog post, 

I feel uneasy linking to a blog post in inline text, maybe a non-normative reference will be enough.

    > and to specifically call out that this is different than the "default 
    > VHost" issue that led ACME to mandate that the "http-01" challenge use 
    > HTTP instead of HTTPS.
    
Agree this is worth doing.