Re: [Acme] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8555 (6364)

Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com> Thu, 04 January 2024 11:32 UTC

Return-Path: <debcooley1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EDAC14F61A for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:32:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.854
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.854 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uMClemPzxO_I for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:32:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x12d.google.com (mail-il1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7242FC1654F3 for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:32:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id e9e14a558f8ab-35fd5a13285so852265ab.3 for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 03:32:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1704367964; x=1704972764; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3xvwARfu3OROZjIs7qaMYsmYXEIylR8MhIbzVfLqCF4=; b=OqOQlvVsMVJNXYF+TtSqOjrSRbok0q0+V7ONUxg+0tM08SKrriSQNBRGHw9UyFCwig YOY2sV12NtiM8p1HH5jiVB2rg5tYY64m9hJa5Gis/Tsk6MCLf15+1eyWkyKDJ3nUlATG HEI67iiYLRMJcVHI4smIN/GAwmQ596BGjy4Ds07aLOzFyIFGAGp343bKvLjocepvArWR Ll0eCBL2Dd1z2sYzQDdvqgkkVfkWMfPHIeFwlzjBK5b6OBZb/8oMp+T7vUrtHbZSdkOd ST+njfrdLDc3n+U+XomDjG59xYCEQry01yXJbeY9p6QkONodDlIUiBvbL8moniXF1eFH UDbA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704367964; x=1704972764; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=3xvwARfu3OROZjIs7qaMYsmYXEIylR8MhIbzVfLqCF4=; b=lxJBe5umOhAxdATC+AFQ8TLPcKBfvsUPpdIdj511Iy81FEkGRe+IniHAZgHDYLO7qI eqRMo33riMG5dJLJZaCO/HmU3WpcsWpLnEacVtABYLVJ6JcYTuXGxW3EsnfsT0Bx2LPH TU+XH4QpM3uPBDzxt9PSbZG65ofXoSw5PTOGO3DPGW2Vqm8R1k56v/Bxze0NcxLWRv5e Jy3Fkiuxi++1fszGNmV8Pc3gHfEkbqwkizhptCu1toLbr6Lfv+ZuUAc/yLd9yDsTDwhG nBe9ZCHI/QF3VTSeQ5hJ4RS5zUfEElDTBaxnS1xwiDrh5DxJ9RwUl/mNnS81S3Eq66kO fJZw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxOA6L/xWbngZ+FYbon4767BwxQK0ClxG47+BPxACZfwVtrjplD bafELV1KAOPARQrb0fdTaqGmtW8VZ/sH4DnMoQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGQMVDxZ2pDEy0j49f8eamxG8BiHhWt5y7+AMKV3gO2hU7TfHUe67aLUJWLibjrAVE/+jtQKz1Bd6O2qo8fEP8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:144a:b0:35f:d78e:764f with SMTP id p10-20020a056e02144a00b0035fd78e764fmr449608ilo.32.1704367964331; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 03:32:44 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201223123453.28D1BF40768@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20201223123453.28D1BF40768@rfc-editor.org>
From: Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 06:32:23 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGgd1Of_L6q_8Gc8WpKULVe9mjtB3Luj52p6AU3rAoQc0pWFgg@mail.gmail.com>
To: rlb@ipv.sx, jsha@eff.org, jdkasten@umich.edu
Cc: rdd@cert.org, ynir.ietf@gmail.com, acme@ietf.org, ekaratsiolis@mtg.de, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000014a40e060e1d17ee"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/W_MTmpunaHXod-79tGKi8wWaw94>
Subject: Re: [Acme] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8555 (6364)
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 11:32:50 -0000

Today's Errata....  This looks editorial to me.  Opinions?

Deb

On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 11:22 AM RFC Errata System <
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8555,
> "Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME)".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6364
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Evangelos Karatsiolis <ekaratsiolis@mtg.de>
>
> Section: 7.1.4
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>    wildcard (optional, boolean):  This field MUST be present and true
>       for authorizations created as a result of a newOrder request
>       containing a DNS identifier with a value that was a wildcard
>       domain name.  For other authorizations, it MUST be absent.
>       Wildcard domain names are described in Section 7.1.3.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    wildcard (optional, boolean):  This field MUST be present and true
>       for authorizations created as a result of a newOrder request
>       containing a DNS identifier with a value that was a wildcard
>       domain name.  For other authorizations, it MUST be absent or
>       false.  For pre-authorizations, it MUST be absent or false.
>       Wildcard domain names are described in Section 7.1.3.
>
> Notes
> -----
> This section states that the wildcard field must be absent for other
> authorizations, but the example in this section has an explicitly set
> wildcard field with value false. The proposed change allows both options,
> either omitting it or explicitly setting it to false. Also a sentence has
> been added to explicitly describe the behavior for pre-authorizations.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8555 (draft-ietf-acme-acme-18)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME)
> Publication Date    : March 2019
> Author(s)           : R. Barnes, J. Hoffman-Andrews, D. McCarney, J. Kasten
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Automated Certificate Management Environment
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> Acme@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>