IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] Content-Type and file extensions for HTTP01 challenges

Niklas Keller <me@kelunik.com> Thu, 19 November 2015 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <me@kelunik.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9F81B3491 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:34:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.027
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.027 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fu7oTWwLTPfM for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:34:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5300::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 795A41B348E for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:34:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1447961683; l=2284; s=domk; d=kelunik.com; h=Content-Type:Cc:To:From:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version; bh=HNbzyEIk/UOgPKT0EA8YhxIe37BqB+LLK+XhkV+BvvY=; b=WoxeYdLdofqg2/7LEoIDIYkNXtCxMmNJwbyI7EHZQaDcKzJAfzOInvTZ0QOUeoR6XVl biWSjRnSwFG3fT7qFxLK6iMwGDM5YprY5rW1YhK/f8FzFktruVN0msOWE2GemYH7yPGg6 F8Srh88xLhz+IpCZSBWhSXxbL5yPTBT7dbQ=
X-RZG-AUTH: :IWkkfkWkbvHsXQGmRYmUo9mls2vWuiu+7SLGvomb4bl9EfHtOnI6
X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00
Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com ([74.125.82.51]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 37.14 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id Q00df8rAJJYhP8C (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (curve secp384r1 with 384 ECDH bits, eq. 7680 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate) for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 20:34:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wmdw130 with SMTP id w130so254024955wmd.0 for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:34:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.195.11.129 with SMTP id ei1mr11617645wjd.129.1447961683197; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:34:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.2.171 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:34:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <09eef8fad12b40f9ba4e8dca5692c152@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <20151113004436.GB18430@eff.org> <CABkgnnU5EzaPA4o7OgnTBpSQCZxjD+QsSV=4_L2rOBeFAoauKA@mail.gmail.com> <20151113011259.GC18430@eff.org> <1F85B447-6C45-4E5A-BB10-F1AD5CB2C3F3@vigilsec.com> <CABsBmKM9t3dX0_zq-EwsTOo7HpeMF6meiw9PhBaQLbHOCpGVGg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iJwqqhMb+7+aj6Sszfi6_K9=rREEK3dbpQ6yddrmHSKsg@mail.gmail.com> <CANUQDCgDeaLtaNfeEUQ3D=7EOwjL-Q0i6Q1FKxMTVtfY9d-bow@mail.gmail.com> <20151118180011.GW18430@eff.org> <CA+9kkMARw2Y86fjFyxoJJU6GJGYmorhJZqCGdns7-CV142v_qA@mail.gmail.com> <CANUQDCizmx=22WwwyVCs55mYYWQ02mYyiGaiC19GG39F9JkViQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnV8=0TVyBU4ugM-R1-izHTx2ugNmOq+MbthQ=qw-r36Hw@mail.gmail.com> <CABsBmKNBcpD59DPNLGKBKq+TyhDxFxp1dZfDWfoDnaW3EGm+wA@mail.gmail.com> <CANUQDCi7YXpLD4DWDWq-1=O-6DYw3oOgZoea3c3sk7LGTV0Xyw@mail.gmail.com> <CABsBmKPOPWJ9nqNgRWga-NxxX_nBejQfrDsJ2Ja5ECOEk3OMPg@mail.gmail.com> <CANUQDCiNB-6o9CBBTVqfJpE+hkmB2CNC2u56OGnr0ht7o+TZCQ@mail.gmail.com> <09eef8fad12b40f9ba4e8dca5692c152@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 20:34:43 +0100
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CANUQDCi0rVmNYqgbVZn1NGcdsQszhCgM9nb0V7VschY-kM0-vQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANUQDCi0rVmNYqgbVZn1NGcdsQszhCgM9nb0V7VschY-kM0-vQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Niklas Keller <me@kelunik.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b86ce48c68b7f0524e9d903"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/Wk0hiNEby-oqyO8yGQVFcEsmxLc>
Cc: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, Peter Eckersley <pde@eff.org>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Bryan Livingston <bryanlivingston@gmail.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Content-Type and file extensions for HTTP01 challenges
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 19:34:47 -0000

2015-11-19 20:23 GMT+01:00 Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com>:

> Ø  I'd prefer that currently, way better than having a lot of different
> specs with only minimal differences.
>
> We’re not going to have lots of different specs, we’re just bumping the
> version number because there are already deployments.  We should end up
> with just one.  Requiring complicated behavior as worse than bumping the
> revision number.
>

Might not that bad as long as CAs offer both versions. But we have other
pending changes? because of insecure? DVSNI challenges. They should maybe
coordinated and updated at once.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email