IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] acme in a firewalled environment

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 02 December 2014 23:02 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448CA1A1BCA for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 15:02:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8mX8FMKIK28U for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 15:02:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F481A1BFB for <acme@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 15:02:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84922BEDB; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 23:01:58 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8px_xJZ5E_ng; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 23:01:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.128.160.222] (unknown [212.76.224.120]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A2DBEBEC0; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 23:01:56 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <547E44E4.4020403@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 23:01:56 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
References: <547DFC4B.9040408@cisco.com> <547DFE94.6090307@cisco.com> <CAL02cgSsLk-xjnL1bC_FbeRykMzAU8a9h-JTqUu58_ZpipCuHQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwjss=jpmhiDRZ_tHy_Z5e9TjQ-Y8AqSKcKKLw1DKs11MQ@mail.gmail.com> <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C71D547A9BBD@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C71D547A9BBD@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/Xx2MuMYzj9Ln1NxeakvhwLJ3mE8
Cc: Ben Schumacher <bschumac@cisco.com>, "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Acme] acme in a firewalled environment
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 23:02:35 -0000

Hi Rich,

On 02/12/14 18:55, Salz, Rich wrote:
> Is it that important to have an individual I-D submission before
> there's even been a BoF about forming a WG?

Sometimes it is, e.g. IPR and all that. Now while I'd be hopeful,
since I know the proponents well, that's not going to be true
for all the folks who might be interested in the proposal and
who prefer .well-known IPR arrangements.

S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email