[Acme] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-tnauthlist-10: (with COMMENT)

[Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-tnauthlist-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-tnauthlist/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you to Sean Turner for the ARTART review.

I support Francesca's DISCUSS.

The shepherd writeup appears to be confused with the one for
draft-ietf-acme-authority-token.  This one has the abstract for that one, for
example.

Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS position.  However, the paragraph containing
the new reference to RFC 4686 seems a bit jumbled.  You might want to take
another run at it before sending it to the RFC Editor.